On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:18:10PM +0800, Ronnel P. Maglasang wrote:
+ Hello,
+
+ I think there was already a thread on this. I just
+ want to raise the question again if anyone has successfully
+ booted an gdbe-encrypted filesystem (everything encrypted except
+ the bootloader). The passphrase
This is not not possible with current GBDE.
I've patches which allows this here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gbde.patch
This is great. Do you intend to commit it someday ? I know the GELI
framework allows to use an encrypted root partition, but it would be
interesting for
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
+ This is not not possible with current GBDE.
+ I've patches which allows this here:
+
+ http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gbde.patch
+
+ This is great. Do you intend to commit it someday ? I know the GELI
+ framework
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Leidinger writes:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not not possible with current GBDE.
I've patches which allows this here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gbde.patch
I fail to see how this allows an encryted root-FS, it
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not not possible with current GBDE.
I've patches which allows this here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gbde.patch
I fail to see how this allows an encryted root-FS, it doesn't add gbde
support to boot0(ext) or to the
Hello everyone,
I developed the patch for 7-CURRENT (also should apply cleanly to 6)
that implements swap reservation accounting and allows to cap the
allocation of anonymous memory to the available swap. Effectively,
this allows to optionally turn off overcommit feature of the VM.
Besides this,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
My points to have /usr/ports in the mtree is for convience that users
creating a jail that is intended to mount the ports tree from the host
system, without having to create their own in every instances. What
do you think about this?
My
Hi, Joerg,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:24:44PM +0800, Xin LI wrote:
My points to have /usr/ports in the mtree is for convience that users
creating a jail that is intended to mount the ports tree from the host
system,
Dear colleagues,
can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs
is malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into rc.subr?
Are swap-backed file systems so inefficient? If no, why not move -M to
/etc/defaultc/rc.conf so admin can override this behaviour?
Sincerely,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:41:24PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
can anyone please point me why mdconfig method for tmpmfs
is malloc-backed instead of swap-backed, and it is hardcoded into rc.subr?
Are swap-backed file systems so inefficient? If no, why not move -M to
10 matches
Mail list logo