Re: Bug in portupgrade

2005-07-31 Thread KOMATSU Shinichiro
Hello. Olivier Certner wrote: Le Mardi 12 Juillet 2005 19:39, Florent Thoumie a écrit : Le Mardi 12 juillet 2005 à 12:55 -0400, Kris Kennaway a écrit : On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Olivier Certner wrote: Hi, There is a bug with portupgrade when it is used to

Kernel Source Divergence, Security (was: booting gbde-encrypted filesystem)

2005-07-31 Thread Allan Fields
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:52:40PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Leidinger writes: Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is not not possible with current GBDE. I've patches which allows this here:

Re: Kernel Source Divergence, Security (was: booting gbde-encrypted filesystem)

2005-07-31 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Allan Fields writes: Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to commit it? ;) I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority for me for the time being. So I am more than happy to see people band together and improve gbde.

Re: Kernel Source Divergence, Security (was: booting gbde-encrypted filesystem)

2005-07-31 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 04:07:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: + In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Allan Fields writes: + + Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to + commit it? ;) + + I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority + for me for the time

Re: Kernel Source Divergence, Security (was: booting gbde-encrypted filesystem)

2005-07-31 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: I'm starting to wonder if we couldn't create one storage-crypto-base and rewrite gbde, geli on top of it. Could be, it all depends how much you actually gain from generalizing common code. Best way to find out is to try :-) --

Possible softupdates bug when a indirect block buffer is reused

2005-07-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
Hi Kirk, hackers! I'm trying to track down a bug that is causing a buffer to be left in a locked state and then causes the filesystem to lock up because of that. The symptoms are that a heavily used filesystem suddenly starts running out of space. It isn't due to deleted

addendum Re: Possible softupdates bug when a indirect block buffer is reused

2005-07-31 Thread Matthew Dillon
Addendum: My user reports that the problem also occurs on FreeBSD 4.10 and 4.11, on uniprocessor builds (other builds and 5.x/6.x have not been tested). I took a look at the 4.x and 6.x softupdates code and didn't see any commits that might address the problem. This

Re: Possible softupdates bug when a indirect block buffer is reused

2005-07-31 Thread Stephan Uphoff
Hi Matthew, We have been testing a fix for this for a few weeks. I will check it in today. Stephan On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 14:40, Matthew Dillon wrote: Hi Kirk, hackers! I'm trying to track down a bug that is causing a buffer to be left in a locked state and then causes the