Re: My wish list for 6.1

Arne Schwabe writes: The emulation or whatever it was was set in the BIOS. And it worked in the BIOS. Worked when the OS got up to sysinstall, too. Just wouldn't work for the loader. Luckily, I didn't need to do anything but wait for it to boot, but I figured the BIOS was

Re: ipfw+nat

OxY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how can i make it to redirect packages from x.x.x.x/32 port 223 to another public ip on the internet? if i use this: rdr em0 x.x.x.x/32 port 223 - public.ip.on.the.internet port 80 tcp it hangs for a while, then operation timeout... thanks! If

Re: My wish list for 6.1

Kris Kennaway wrote on Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 12:35:47PM +1030: Martin Cracauer wrote: I tried to model different worklods. The parallel part of my benchmark suite has CPU-heavy processes, short plain http, php, long plain http and mixtures thereof. None of these showed the SMP

[unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010

I gave a send-pr around the improvement of the unionfs. Please look at the follow url in specific for interested poeple whom it may committer or official people who can merge my patches. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=91010 The established unionfs implementaion is weak around thier

Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010

6.0-RELEASE needs follow patch: patch start diff -urN unionfs.current/fs/union_vfsops.c unionfs/fs/union_vfsops.c --- unionfs.current/fs/union_vfsops.cWed Dec 28 16:58:04 2005 +++ unionfs/fs/union_vfsops.cWed Dec 28 22:54:20 2005 @@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ unionfs_quotactl(struct mount