Re: (feature change request) remove link-layer generated routes from netstat -r

On Thursday 23 February 2006 07:06, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: netstat -r prints link-layer generated routes and many times the output becomes somehow obscure. For example: [EMAIL

Saving register values

Hi I want to access cpu registers using KLD.How should i do that? My aim is to save current registers values on disk. Any documentation or code regrading this will also help me. Thanks in advance. -Pranav Sawargaonkar

Re: Bad block - file mapping

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: : LBA - slice/partition/offset - fs/inode - list of file names : Logic for the second step should be in fsck. Yea. I was kinda hoping to find a tool that would do that given the LBA of the disk... I can do the math by hand, but if I don't

Re: Saving register values

On 2006-02-23 15:18, Pranav Sawargaonkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to access cpu registers using KLD.How should i do that? My aim is to save current registers values on disk. Any documentation or code regrading this will also help me. Are you sure something like this would be useful?

Re: Saving register values

I want to access cpu registers I don't know if this helps. [...] #include ucontext.h [...] ucontext_t ctx; getcontext(ctx); printf(%#010x\n, ctx.uc_mcontext.mc_eax); [...] Look at /usr/include/ucontext.h greets Andreas ___

wireless on a laptop

hi all- i have a D-Link DWL-G650M PCCard (Atheros) and an IBM T40 laptop. they don't want to talk with each other. the T40 has a built in Aironet, but the driver generates received 194 bytes, expected 196 bytes messages in the system log, and i can't get it to work. so i bought this

4.11R P13 Kernel Panic: page fault

Hi, I have an Intel S845WD1 motherboard with a 3Ware 74XX or 75XX card and two Intel NICs (for a grand total of 4 Intel NICs) and 512 megs of ECC RAM. The system was quite stable for a while until I upgraded from 4.9 to 4.11. Afterwards, every 14-16 days I would get a panic: page fault. I

Re: (feature change request) remove link-layer generated routes from netstat -r

On Thursday 23 February 2006 02:56, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2006 07:06, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: netstat -r prints link-layer generated routes and many times the output becomes somehow obscure. For

Re: (feature change request) remove link-layer generated routes from netstat -r

John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2006 02:56, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2006 07:06, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: netstat -r prints link-layer generated routes and many times the output becomes

Re: urgent, need to recover superblock!

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:00:24PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:23:13 -0500 From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: urgent, need to recover superblock! To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;

Re: (feature change request) remove link-layer generated routes from netstat -r

On 2006-02-23 12:14, Gary Corcoran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2006 02:56, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2006 07:06, Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: netstat -r prints link-layer

Re: Saving register values

Thanks for reply. Actually i want to save cpu registers values just before the time of shutdown that is why i am asking question.So is it possible for me to do that?and if possible how should approach for it? Thanks in advance. On 2/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to

Re: does ukbd delay break scan codes?

Norbert, [...] I still do not know where it comes from, but what I found so far is, that the usb keyboard (or ukbd driver) seems to delay the break codes for keys with prefix E0 (which may or may not have anything to do with my problem). E.g., I press Keypad-Enter and see E0 1C E0

Re: does ukbd delay break scan codes?

Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: Norbert, [...] I still do not know where it comes from, but what I found so far is, that the usb keyboard (or ukbd driver) seems to delay the break codes for keys with prefix E0 (which may or may not have anything to do with my problem). E.g., I press Keypad-Enter and

Re: [PATCH] does ukbd delay break scan codes?

Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: [...] I still do not know where it comes from, but what I found so far is, that the usb keyboard (or ukbd driver) seems to delay the break codes for keys with prefix E0 (which may or may not have anything to do with my problem). E.g., I press Keypad-Enter and see E0

RE: [PATCH] does ukbd delay break scan codes?

Hello Maksim, yes I too looked at ukbd code and found the same. I already put a patch on the bug list yesterday. In the mean time I compared the ukbd code to that of NetBSD and OpenBSD. Their code is quite different. I expect that the DragenFlyBSD guys may have the same problem, but did not find

Re: wireless on a laptop

On Thursday 23 February 2006 17:40, Chuck Lever wrote: hi all- i have a D-Link DWL-G650M PCCard (Atheros) and an IBM T40 laptop. they don't want to talk with each other. the T40 has a built in Aironet, but the driver generates received 194 bytes, expected 196 bytes messages in the system

Re: urgent, need to recover superblock!

On Thursday 23 February 2006 04:43, Scott Long wrote: Dave wrote: Hello, Some urgency on this issue!I've got a 10 gb ide drive that has critical data on one of it's partitions /dev/ad1e. This drive was originally gmirrored in another box it worked fine, it was the master drive.