On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:45:20AM +0300, Alex Semenyaka wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 08:57:21PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
More details: during the install, part of the toolchain and
some special install tools that were built on the build
host are used. They have been built using that
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:26:26AM +0300, Alex Semenyaka wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:41:32PM +0700, Vitaliy Ovsyannikov wrote:
Hello, freebsd-hackers.
I've stuck with the unable to make watchdogs for daemons running via
startup rc-scripts. In linux we can just put the process in the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:09:26PM +0200, Vlad GALU wrote:
I wrote a piece of software that has to get the current
timestamp, one way or the other, a huge number of times per second.
Apart from the empyrical tests one can perform to find out the
timekeeping scheme with the less
From: David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The TSC is always fastest, but unfortunately under some circumstances
it can't be trusted (if your CPU has throttle modes to save power
or on some SMP systems where the two TSCs in each CPU give different
values).
If I remember correctly, all the SMP CPUs on
On Mon, 2006-Feb-27 20:52:57 -0500, Carroll Kong wrote:
Okay this time my kernel was recompiled so there are no modules to make it
easier to see all of the symbols.
If you cd to your kernel build directory (eg /usr/src/sys/compile/DAEMON)
and run 'make gdbinit' and then use kgdb in that
On Saturday 25 February 2006 06:04, Kazuaki Oda wrote:
Hi,
When reading kern_switch.c, I noticed odd difference between !SMP and
SMP in maybe_preempt_in_ksegrp().
In !SMP case:
=
#ifdef PREEMPTION
#ifndef FULL_PREEMPTION
On Monday 27 February 2006 13:31, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Tanmay wrote this message on Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 13:56 +0530:
How do I access the address space ie text,data and stack of a (user
level)process whose pid I know from my kld. for eg: Suppose 'vi' is running
and I want to access its
I've ordered a new CPU and power supply already. After installing those
parts, I hope the problem goes away. I would probably bet it's more
likely the power as someone else already mentioned that's a big culprit.
If it still fails after those two changes, then I can consider the
downgrade. I
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Rohit Jalan wrote:
Is there an upper limit on the amount of fragmentation / wastage that can
occur in a UMA zone?
Is there a method to know the total number of pages used by a UMA zone at
some instance of time?
Hey there Rohit,
UMA allocates pages retrieved from VM as
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2006 06:04, Kazuaki Oda wrote:
Hi,
When reading kern_switch.c, I noticed odd difference between !SMP and
SMP in maybe_preempt_in_ksegrp().
In !SMP case:
=
#ifdef PREEMPTION
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Ashok Shrestha wrote:
VMWARE GSX was released recently for free.
[http://www.vmware.com/news/releases/server_beta.html]
Is anyone working on a port for this?
I've started on it, but I haven't made much progress yet.
Scott
Anyone who's interested
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Ashok Shrestha wrote:
VMWARE GSX was released recently for free.
[http://www.vmware.com/news/releases/server_beta.html]
Is anyone working on a port for this?
I've started on it, but I haven't made much
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Isn't is reasonable to add corresponding optional functionality
into the buld process?
No.
Why? :)
For example, if -DSTATIC_TOOLCHAIN (or
pick any other name) is set, then:
1) build toolchain statically linked
This is
Hi Robert,
My problem is that I need to enforce a single memory limit
on the total number of pages used by multiple zones.
The limit changes dynamically based on the number of pages
being used by other non-zone allocations and also on the amount
of available swap and memory.
I've tried to do
14 matches
Mail list logo
