On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:54:49AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
I have two questions about this function:
1. vm_fault() does not guarantee, that (possibly) faulted in page
will be in the object or in one of backing objects when
vm_fault() returns, because a page can become not
Assume that thread owns LK_SHARED lock on vnode vp, and the call
vn_lock(vp, LK_UPGRADE|LK_RETRY, curthread) is made. Is this upgrade
safe from dropping shared lock during the retries made in vn_lock ?
Man page for lockmgr says that failed LK_UPGRADE request
returns with shared lock dropped. But,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:20:03PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: You can do it with /etc/ttys. Actually this point is missing by many
: FreeBSD administrators, people just think of /etc/ttys in term of
: terminals and stuff :) But if youi'll open the man page you would
: found the following:
alc (Alan Cox) is ill at the moment so may not be responding.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the Xen website, it's been ported to FreeBSD
[http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/OSCompatibility].
Anybody know where port is?
-Ashok Shrestha
On 2/28/06, Seán C. Farley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Scott Long wrote:
-CURRENT runs on 3.0 as a domU. There is partial dom0 support. The
changes have not gone back into the mainline because xenbus is
extremely difficult to integrate cleanly. You can check on the state
of the xen3 branch in perforce.
-Kip
On 3/2/06, Ashok Shrestha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6 matches
Mail list logo
