On Mon, March 6, 2006 3:17 pm, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Cesar wrote:
>> I have some NAT boxes running FreeBSD, each of these boxes do NAT
>> for like 100+ people. Almost everyday my IPs got blacklisted because
>> of spam. I cant block the smtp traffic going out became some people
>> need it to send
All,
I've done some hacking on bootparamd to support multiple subnets
(along with applying some patches to allow some Sun-specific behavior) that
I'm using for jumpstarting Solaris/Sparc boxes across a boatload of small
subnets.
The most obvious change is adding a -R parameter, th
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ipfw add fwd xx.xx.xx.xx,25 tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to any 25
> > > I got some matches in this rule when I try to send an email, but I
> > > didnt get redirected to my email server.
this is pretty easy with ipnat, this is for smtp
> > ipfw add fwd xx.xx.xx.xx,25 tcp from 192.168.0.0/24 to any 25
> > I got some matches in this rule when I try to send an email, but I
> > didnt get redirected to my email server.
>
> our email server needs the same rule, fwd 127.0.0.1 .. so that the
> incoming packet is not rejected.
>
Cesar wrote:
Hi,
I have some NAT boxes running FreeBSD, each of these boxes do NAT
for like 100+ people.
Almost everyday my IPs got blacklisted because of spam. I cant block
the smtp traffic going out became some people need it to send true
e-mails.
Are there any tool to detect/block
I was wondering if there were any plans on getting the ieee1284_print_id()
function in src/sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c to work properly. I was trying to see
about getting HPLIP converted to FreeBSD, but it's hpiod program requires an
ioctl to access the printer andget the IEEE1284 device ID string to ident
find(1)'s -prune primary does not work if depth-first traversal (-d,
-depth, also implied by -delete) is in effect. The reason is that it is
(obviously) not possible to prune a directory when visiting it after all
entries in it.
This causes /etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks (if enabled) to recur
Well bad news. It happened again even with a new CPU and new PowerSupply.
However, the good news is that it seems to be saving the core dumps a bit
more consistently now. I swapped the motherboard back to the old one.
Honestly, I've had similar core dumps in either case, I'm starting to think
it
2006/3/6, Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:20:10AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I did not received too much feedbacks about Part I stability, but I went
> on,
> > so Part II is available for tests.
> >
> > It presents an mmx copy which doesn't give much perfo
With the fwd rule, you can only redirect to 127.0.0.1 when you want your
machine to
intercept the connection.
I'd suggest putting a tcp proxy or smtp proxy listening on 127.0.0.1 port 25
that just forwards to the mailserver box.
Baldur
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:39:46AM -0300, Cesar wrote:
> Hi,
Dear sirs
I am a freebsd 6.0-stable user. Recently my thinkpad will panic when I
use vmware 3.2.1 and mozilla at sames times. So I think I can send these
info to you. Help you can help me.
thanks you a lot.
kevin.rong
FreeBSD r
Hi,
I have some NAT boxes running FreeBSD, each of these boxes do NAT for
like 100+ people.
Almost everyday my IPs got blacklisted because of spam. I cant block the
smtp traffic going out became some people need it to send true e-mails.
Are there any tool to detect/block those spams?
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:10:10AM -0800, Anupam Deshpande wrote:
+> I successfully created a file using kern_open().
+> Now I want to 'write to' or 'read from' the file.What functions should
+> I use for that purpose?
This is not so trivial as it is in userland (but you already know
that:)).
Her
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:26:35PM +0530, Tanmay wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:33:47PM -0500,
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >you can use the proc_rwmem() function (it takes a uio >and a struct proc)
> >to do the actual I/O portion. You can see example use in >the ptrace()
> >syscall.
>
> Thanks.T
Hi,
I did not received too much feedbacks about Part I stability, but I went on,
so Part II is available for tests.
It presents an mmx copy which doesn't give much performance increases but
what I need now is testing for correctness. In particular I would see
feedbacks about races inside dropping/
On 3/5/06, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Anupam Deshpande wrote:
>
> > I have used open system call in KLD to create a file. But after
> > inserting the module the file is not created though the file descriptor
> > returned is non zero. I also used close s
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:11:24PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
> hi,
>
> sched_newthread(struct thread *td)
> {
>struct td_sched *ke;
>
> ke = (struct td_sched *) (td + 1);
> bzero(ke, sizeof(*ke));
> td->td_sched = ke;
> ke->ke_thread = td;
> ke->k
17 matches
Mail list logo
