Re: amd64 questions

2006-08-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:43:26PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: : > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: : >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:40:24PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: : >>> I'm not sure wh

Re: A handy utility (at least for me)

2006-08-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dirk Engling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Rick C. Petty wrote: : > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:19:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: : >> My /usr/ports directory was occuping 24 gigs, of which 20 was just from the : >> 'work' directories ! : >> : >> Removin

Re: A handy utility (at least for me)

2006-08-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Rick C. Petty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:19:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: : > : > My /usr/ports directory was occuping 24 gigs, of which 20 was just from the : > 'work' directories ! : > : > Removing them one by one wa

Re: amd64 questions

2006-08-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
For what it is worth, I'm working on patches that would let one build and install compiler for machine foo, machine_arch bar sufficiently well that the cross building system of gnu configure (autoconf) can use them to build many simple things, and a few complicated ones. This is similar to the -m3

Re: jails, cron and sendmail

2006-08-27 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.08.27 02:13:03 +0200, Dirk Engling wrote: > I have the following problem: since I need and do not like any kind of > smtp activity in my jails (there's no 127.0.0.1 in a jail, all services > listen to the jails external interface), I put those lines into my > /etc/rc.conf: [...] I know it

Re: 6-STABLE snapshot (background fsck) lock-up

2006-08-27 Thread Eric Anderson
On 08/27/06 00:53, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:19:40PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: On 08/26/06 07:44, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:23:36AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: Hmm - had another panic. Again, screen shots are here: http://www.googlebi

Re: jails, cron and sendmail

2006-08-27 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dirk Engling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: >> That's just a default. You can can change it by adding > > cron_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf in each jail. So maybe the question > > should be "Why haven't your turned off cron in the jails?" > > Because the system uses cron to start

Re: jails, cron and sendmail

2006-08-27 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> But it prevents a vanilla system to try to connect to localhost:25 once > a day. Only those periodic scripts send mails per default. If you still want mail to work, but don't want to listen on a network port: cd /etc/mail/ make vi `hostname`.submit.mc Change the 127.0.0.1 in the line "FEATU

Re: jails, cron and sendmail

2006-08-27 Thread Dirk Engling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Meyer wrote: > That's just a default. You can can change it by adding > cron_enable="NO" to /etc/rc.conf in each jail. So maybe the question > should be "Why haven't your turned off cron in the jails?" Because the system uses cron to start its p

Re: jails, cron and sendmail

2006-08-27 Thread Dirk Engling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Shapiro wrote: > Unfortunately, in jails, localhost gets remapped to the jail IP > address and therefore, he is correct, it is accepting connections > from the outside world. This is one thing that I would love to > see fixed in jails. There

Re: [PATCH] get periodic.conf to use the correct ports INDEX

2006-08-27 Thread Niclas Zeising
Doug Barton wrote: Niclas Zeising wrote: The periodic.conf in 7-CURRENT is still set to use the INDEX-6 ports index file, instead of INDEX-7 which is the default on 7-CURRENT. This should, I think, be changed. Done. Next time please consider using send-pr for this type of thing. Doug Thank

Re: [PATCH] get periodic.conf to use the correct ports INDEX

2006-08-27 Thread Doug Barton
Niclas Zeising wrote: > The periodic.conf in 7-CURRENT is still set to use the INDEX-6 ports > index file, instead of INDEX-7 which is the default on 7-CURRENT. This > should, I think, be changed. Done. Next time please consider using send-pr for this type of thing. Doug -- This .signature