[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) writes:
> Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' +
> > 'sys'.
> > But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I
> > got from the other messages in this
Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' + 'sys'.
> But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I
> got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user' time is somewhat
> meaningless (i.e. u
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:13:55PM -0400, Gary Corcoran wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> >In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >>The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' +
> >>'sys'.
> >>But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both mac
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' + 'sys'.
But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I
got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user'
Danny Braniss wrote on Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:36:01AM +0300:
> Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
>
> SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
> K8-class CPU)
> one 70g sata disk
> DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(T
On Thursday 14 September 2006 19:28, Gary Corcoran wrote:
> The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' +
> 'sys'. But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The
> sense I got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user' time is
> somewhat mea
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' + 'sys'.
> But here 'user' is much greater than 'real' for both machines! The sense I
> got from the other messages in this thread is that 'user' time is somewha
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:28:03PM -0400, Gary Corcoran wrote:
> The confusing thing is that I thought 'real' time should be >= 'user' +
> 'sys'.
No. This is at best only ever approximately true on a uniprocessor
machine when there is no blocking I/O being performed.
A bit of thought about the
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
K8-class CPU)
one 70g sata disk
DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeo
Hey John,
thanks for responding :)> > In working with a device driver, sometimes> > after
I rebuild it and reload it, I'll get> > system log errors like> > > >
'link_elf: symbol yyz undefined'> > I assume that it fails to load when you get
this message? yes. The thing to note, and i probably
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Sean Thomson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi Folks,
:
: In working with a device driver, sometimes
: after I rebuild it and reload it, I'll get
: system log errors like
:
: 'link_elf: symbol yyz undefined'
:
: Actually, I'll get an entry for all
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > What's the CPU configuration? The AMD is dual core - is that it? Could
> > the Xeon be dual-core and hyperthreaded, so it's got that many more
> > CPUs to contri
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
>
> SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
> K8-class CPU)
> one 70g sata disk
> DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.9
Danny Braniss wrote:
> [...]
> but the original question stands:
> why is the user time between the boxes so different,
Because the dual-core Opteron is significantly faster than
the (single-core) Xeon, so buildworld takes less (user) CPU
time. By the way, certain parts of buildworld make use
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:36, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
> >
> > SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
> > K8-class
> > CPU) one 70g sata disk
> > DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:36, Danny Braniss wrote:
> Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
>
> SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
> K8-class
> CPU) one 70g sata disk
> DELL 2950: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3192.98-MHz
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > Im testing these 2 boxes, Sun X4100 and Dell-2950, and:
> >
> > SUN X4100: Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 280 (2393.19-MHz
> > K8-class CPU)
> > one 70g sata disk
> > DELL 2950: Intel
17 matches
Mail list logo
