[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 00:50 +0200:
> >> what should it look like?
> >
> >You should be creating a mutex (using mtx_init) at attach time, and
> >pass that mutex instead of Giant...
>
> and don't touch busdma_lock_mutex? ( i am passing NULL, NULL at the moment
Dear John-Mark,
> what should it look like?
You should be creating a mutex (using mtx_init) at attach time, and
pass that mutex instead of Giant...
and don't touch busdma_lock_mutex? ( i am passing NULL, NULL at the moment )
> and how will i prevent the interrupt routine from interfering wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:04 +0200:
> i have been tweaking the pvr250 driver to support pvr150s/500s. now i
> want to remove Giant from the code.
>
> problem is, i am not sure what to do. i have created a mutex which
> replaces the spltty and splx calls. but t
David Xu wrote this message on Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 17:17 +0800:
> work in the past. Also rfork() does not allow you to specify user stack, you
> have to add some tricky code to make it safe before new
> thread really can do real work, [...]
That's why you use rfork_thread(3)...
--
John-Mark G
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:08:48PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> src.conf(5) manual page states:
>
> % The src.conf file contains settings that will apply to every build
> % involving the FreeBSD source tree; see build(7).
> % ...
> % The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compil
Hi,
src.conf(5) manual page states:
% The src.conf file contains settings that will apply to every build
% involving the FreeBSD source tree; see build(7).
% ...
% The only purpose of src.conf is to control the compilation of the FreeBSD
% sources, which are usually found in /usr/src.
However, s
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Karl Pielorz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
I have a crash dump from it - which I've saved (I'm moderately familiar
with working with dumps, but this one is split into two?)
If anyone has any pointers, or can do some hand holding to
Karl Pielorz wrote:
Thanks for the link! Anyone know much is all that lot (such as
INVARIANTS/WITNESS) etc. likely to slow the machine down? - A few
percent? More?
Huge. See http://wikitest.freebsd.org/WitnessPerformance
I'm just a little hesitant to put it all in, and end up with a machin
--On 20 October 2006 14:01 +0300 Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
I have a crash dump from it - which I've saved (I'm moderately familiar
with working with dumps, but this one is split into two?)
If anyone has any poi
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:56:33 +0100
Karl Pielorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've got an HP DL380 server, stacked out with drives running Sendmail. The
> machine is quite busy (LA rarely below 4 - and it's three 'spindle' sets of
> RAID drives are always busy). It's probably con
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:56:33AM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> I have a crash dump from it - which I've saved (I'm moderately familiar
> with working with dumps, but this one is split into two?)
>
> If anyone has any pointers, or can do some hand holding to get more info
> from the dump, or
Hi All,
We've got an HP DL380 server, stacked out with drives running Sendmail. The
machine is quite busy (LA rarely below 4 - and it's three 'spindle' sets of
RAID drives are always busy). It's probably constantly running 200-300
copies of sendmail, plus an assortment of other processes (mos
12 matches
Mail list logo
