Hi,
I've got 2 questions about PIC.
1. NO_PIC variable. It is defined in several places across the system sources.
As an example:
./lib/libcompat/Makefile:NO_PIC=
./lib/libdisk/Makefile:NO_PIC=
./lib/libstand/Makefile:NO_PIC=
./lib/liby/Makefile:NO_PIC=
What are the reasons for explicitly
IMHO many problems arise when someone tries to please even the
stupidest user by writing a fool-proof software. To me the beauty
of Unixes is that they are _not_ fool-proof, e.g. your are holding
a real gun, you should be carefull not to point it to your head
and pull the trigger.
If we
Thanks, but it's not over NFS. The problem was occurring on the last
server, different hardware and earlier versions of the same software. I was
surprised that it showed up again after the upgrade. I've had everything
from garbage at the top of mail files, to missing colons in the From
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:26:31PM +0400, Michael Bushkov wrote:
Hi,
I've got 2 questions about PIC.
2. And theoretical question. Does every object that will be linked into the
shared library should be built with PIC enabled?
This is not so theoretical. This is required, for instance, for
Yan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently writing my first kernel module to extract data from
the kernel and bring it into user-space. As I understand, FreeBSD
only loads pages of the text segment that it is about to use by
registering its handler for page faults, and bringing in more
Actually, I would like to support this motion... Thinking over the possible
behaviours of -P is to sit in a room saying to delete or not to delete... If
you think it over from a higher perspective, The UNIX Way (TM) is to have
individual commands for specific tasks and to extract tasks from
--- Daniel Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I would like to support this motion...
Thinking over the possible behaviours of -P is to
sit in a room saying to delete or not to delete...
If you think it over from a higher perspective,
The UNIX Way (TM) is to have individual
Having thought this over some more, if a
shred/scramble/scrub command is created in its own
right, then a number of new features could be added
that do not currently exist.
- The command could be writen to protect a single
file, or, it could also write to an entire file
system/media.
--- Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having thought this over some more, if a
shred/scramble/scrub command is created in its own
right, then a number of new features could be
added
that do not currently exist.
- The command could be writen to protect a single
file, or, it
Hi...
What I'm on:
FreeBSD/i386 version 6.1
What I'm doing:
Trying to get PHP to compile against a Linux binary install of the
Informix Client SDK, and I've been running into an issue I cannot
correct.
Compile Error:
...
/usr/local/ifx/lib/esql/checkapi.o -lifglx -lcrypt -liconv -liconv -lm
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:07:05PM -0600, Shane wrote:
Hi...
What I'm on:
FreeBSD/i386 version 6.1
What I'm doing:
Trying to get PHP to compile against a Linux binary install of the
Informix Client SDK, and I've been running into an issue I cannot
correct.
Compile Error:
...
All,
I have added two options to the sockstat command to list tcp and/or udp sockets.
-t ([-]-tcp) :display tcp sockets
-d ([-]-udp) : display udp sockets
The previous command line options are unchanged, although I did change
the use of getopt to getopt_long_only and added long
Having cleared my head a bit more, I realise most of
this can be done with consecutive runs of 'dd'.
I think I've reached a conclusion here.
that is, install ports/sysutils/obliterate/?
Tim.
[SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
