Value range of IPC semaphores

2006-11-10 Thread Nguyen Tam Chinh
Hello, I'm tuning some IPC semaphores parameters in 6.1-STABLE for a busy PostGreSQL server (8.1.4). I still now can not find the value range (exactly the maximum value) and its dependencies on other system wide parameters of these parameters: kern.ipc.semmni, kern.ipc.semmns,

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Nov 9, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Florent Thoumie wrote: On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: Hi all, I'm pleased to tell you i got the latest wpi driver from Damien Bergamini to work properly on a latest -stable on an Acer laptop. Nice work! Unfortunately,

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Florent Thoumie wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Florent Thoumie wrote: On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: Hi all, I'm pleased to tell you i got the latest wpi driver from Damien Bergamini to work properly on a latest -stable on an Acer laptop.

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver from Damien, that circulates on the net everywhere, but it only works for some lucky people. As for me, I get an error message when loading the module, that it could

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 10 November 2006 10:37, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver from Damien, that circulates on the net everywhere, but it only works for some lucky people. As for me, I get

Re: sockstat tcp/udp switches

2006-11-10 Thread Josh Carroll
Below is the patch using strsep instead. I also updated the gather_inet function to print a message that a protocol is not supported if it exists in /etc/protocols, but does not have a case in the gather_inet function. So, anyone interested in committing this? :) Do people think this would be

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Attilio Rao
2006/11/10, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 10 November 2006 10:37, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver from Damien, that circulates on the net everywhere, but it only works

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Attilio Rao
2006/11/10, Attilio Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/11/10, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 10 November 2006 10:37, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver from Damien, that

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Attilio Rao
2006/11/10, Attilio Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/11/10, Attilio Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/11/10, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 10 November 2006 10:37, Massimo Lusetti wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote: Unfortunately, it seems that this is still

Re: New wpi driver

2006-11-10 Thread Attilio Rao
First of all, WPI_PCI_BAR0 might not be defined in this way, but it should really use PCIR_BAR() macro. Then, probabilly, gabor's device I/O space is relative to another BAR, so simply try all 6 using PCIR_BAR(n) where n range is 0-6 until it does allocate. Sorry, n ranges 0-5... (as I said