unsubscribing from freebsd lists (was "Re: contiguous memory allocation problem")

Kamal R. Prasad wrote: Hello, I would like to unsubscribe myself from all freebsd mailing lists. I have sent an unsubscribe to freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe, but did not get any response to verify. Since the admin is on the mailing list, I would appreciate if you can delete my name and/or email me

Re: Hardening FreeBSD, does anyone have any documentation that may help?

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: The code is integrated in GCC 4.1, patching if needed at all is quite contained. But we're still running gcc 3.4.6, and won't be moving to gcc 4.1 on 6.x. The gcc 3.4.6 patch is the one we're reluctant to have to support. The ABI impact is l

Nvidia on amd64

Hello, A while ago there was a post about features missing in FreeBSD in order to allow for the Nvidia driver to work correctly on the amd64 platform. I'm curious if anyone has any information about the progress in this area? Regards, Ralph. ___ freebs

[ANN] unionfs patchset-17 release, lock mechanism changed for robust working

Hi Guys! It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of the unionfs patchset-17. p17 have some significant improvements around the lock mechanism for robust and stable working. Patchset-17: For 7-current http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p17.diff For 6.x

Re: jail2 patchset 14

Eldar T. Zaitov wrote: Have tried Jail2 patchset #14 on 6.2-PRERELEASE, everything compiles and works ok, but resolve. gethostbyname always returns NULL, but host/dig works ok. here's an example: virtual# host mail.ru mail.ru has address 194.67.57.26 mail.ru mail is handled by 10 mxs.mail.ru. vi

Re: Unable to stop a jail

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steven Hartland wrote: In essence, this would move to having two reference counts on the prison: a "strong" reference that has to do with having process members, and a "weak" reference that has to do with ucreds pointing at the prison. The proposal sounds like a good idea

Re: Unable to stop a jail

Robert Watson wrote: Not all cases of straggling jails are leaks -- does netstat -n show that all the TIME_WAIT TCP connections in the jail have been GC'd? Because security state may be used in the network stack for TCP packet transmission/reception, the ucred remains referenced until the last

Re: Unable to stop a jail

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steven Hartland wrote: We've got a jail here which we cant stop with either killall jexec or jkill all return success but jls still reports the jail as running. The machines running several other jails which I cant restart at thi

Re: Unable to stop a jail

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Steven Hartland wrote: Hi, We've got a jail here which we cant stop with either killall jexec or jkill all return success but jls still reports the jail as running. The machines running several other jails which I cant restart at this time so I ended up starting the jail ag

Re: Unable to stop a jail

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, 10:43-, Steven Hartland wrote: > We've got a jail here which we cant stop with either killall > jexec or jkill all return success but jls still reports > the jail as running. > > The machines running several other jails which I cant restart > at this time so I ended up star

Unable to stop a jail

We've got a jail here which we cant stop with either killall jexec or jkill all return success but jls still reports the jail as running. The machines running several other jails which I cant restart at this time so I ended up starting the jail again jls now reports: jls JID IP Address Ho

jail2 patchset 14

Have tried Jail2 patchset #14 on 6.2-PRERELEASE, everything compiles and works ok, but resolve. gethostbyname always returns NULL, but host/dig works ok. here's an example: virtual# host mail.ru mail.ru has address 194.67.57.26 mail.ru mail is handled by 10 mxs.mail.ru. virtual# ping mail.ru ping: