Re: Trying to join an already exited pthread

2007-02-07 Thread Steve Watt
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just wondering: > >If I was to try and join a pthread that already exited, would there be an error >message output and/or errno set to an error value, or would a system hang? Was the thread created with detach state set PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED o

Re: Trying to join an already exited pthread

2007-02-07 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just wondering: If I was to try and join a pthread that already exited, would there be an error message output and/or errno set to an error value, o

Re: Trying to join an already exited pthread

2007-02-07 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Pietro Cerutti wrote: On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just wondering: If I was to try and join a pthread that already exited, would there be an error message output and/or errno set to an error value, or would a system hang? man pthread_join(3):

Re: Trying to join an already exited pthread

2007-02-07 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just wondering: If I was to try and join a pthread that already exited, would there be an error message output and/or errno set to an error value, or would a system hang? man pthread_join(3): ERRORS The pthread_join() function will

Trying to join an already exited pthread

2007-02-07 Thread youshi10
Just wondering: If I was to try and join a pthread that already exited, would there be an error message output and/or errno set to an error value, or would a system hang? It this variable on Unix OSes? -Garrett ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailin

Re: unique hardware identification

2007-02-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 01 February 2007 14:40, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:38:51AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: ptrace equivalents between freebsd and linux?

2007-02-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 14:59, Steve Kargl wrote: > MPICH2 has the ability to use shared memory as one of > its communication channel. Unfortuantely, the build > dies with an error realted to ptrace. In looking at > a linux manpage for ptrace, I've identified that the > linux PTRACE_ATTACH and

Re: /etc/group limits (REAL limits)

2007-02-07 Thread Sergey Babkin
>From: Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On one of my boxes where I have a decent amount of (less than 50) users >in a few groups, I finally hit the limit. Not 1024 bytes though (that I >know of). When that happens though, it is sooner than expected, and >tools (like 'id') seg fault (and cor

Re: /etc/group limits (REAL limits)

2007-02-07 Thread Eric Anderson
On 02/07/07 07:44, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:17:51PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, 22:56-0600, Eric Anderson wrote: On one of my boxes where I have a decent amount of (less than 50) users in a few groups, I finally hit the limit. Not 1024 bytes thou

Re: /etc/group limits (REAL limits)

2007-02-07 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:00:07AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > On 02/07/07 07:44, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:17:51PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > >>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, 22:56-0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > >> > >>>On one of my boxes where I have a decent amount of (less

Re: /etc/group limits (REAL limits)

2007-02-07 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:17:51PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, 22:56-0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > On one of my boxes where I have a decent amount of (less than 50) > > users in a few groups, I finally hit the limit. Not 1024 bytes > > though (that I know of). When that

Re: nullfs and named pipes.

2007-02-07 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:15:46AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > >Is this a fundamental design issue with null_fs or a bug? > > > >There appears to be a lot of confusion on the lists about this point > >as many people are trying to do this so as to make a single mysql > >server available from w

Re: Use of kqueue/kevent NOTE_EXTEND fflag in VFS

2007-02-07 Thread Florent Thoumie
Ali Mashtizadeh wrote: > I saw in the past several people have asked if theres a way to monitor all > file operations (not limited to a set of Vnodes). Is this likely to be > implemented any time soon? Or is there a good alternative? If I understand correctly what you're looking for, then you want

Re: /etc/group limits (REAL limits)

2007-02-07 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, 22:56-0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > On one of my boxes where I have a decent amount of (less than 50) > users in a few groups, I finally hit the limit. Not 1024 bytes > though (that I know of). When that happens though, it is sooner than > expected, and tools (like 'id') seg fa