Re: PING: Someone on the core team. (Modem Problem)

2007-02-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it does not report as fast. That means it's getting a slow interrupt handler (or maybe none at all from what you wrote below). Here is the verbose dmesg from a reboot that I did just now: sio0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid

Re: PING: Someone on the core team. (Modem Problem)

2007-02-17 Thread Daniel Rudy
At about the time of 2/17/2007 1:12 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following: On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it does not report as fast. That means it's getting a slow interrupt handler (or maybe none at all from what you wrote below). Here is the

Abyssmal dump cache efficiency

2007-02-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
I've been looking into the efficiency of the caching in dump(8) and it's abyssmal: After instrumenting dump(8) and looking at its access patterns, it turns out that it typically reads roughly three times as much data into its cache as it should, whilst using five times as much RAM as requested.

Re: PING: Someone on the core team. (Modem Problem)

2007-02-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2007-Feb-17 13:46:20 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I commented out the sio driver and replaced it with the uart driver. Now it works fine. Thank you for your extensive help in this matter. So I assume that sio(4) and uart(4) are mutually exclusive of each other? Yes.