On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it does not report as fast.
That means it's getting a slow interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
from what you wrote below).
Here is the verbose dmesg from a reboot that I did just now:
sio0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid
At about the time of 2/17/2007 1:12 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it does not report as fast.
That means it's getting a slow interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
from what you wrote below).
Here is the
I've been looking into the efficiency of the caching in dump(8) and
it's abyssmal: After instrumenting dump(8) and looking at its access
patterns, it turns out that it typically reads roughly three times as
much data into its cache as it should, whilst using five times as
much RAM as requested.
On 2007-Feb-17 13:46:20 -0800, Daniel Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I commented out the sio driver and replaced it with the uart
driver. Now it works fine. Thank you for your extensive help in this
matter. So I assume that sio(4) and uart(4) are mutually exclusive of
each other?
Yes.
4 matches
Mail list logo