On 2007-Feb-17 13:46:20 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, I commented out the sio driver and replaced it with the uart
>driver. Now it works fine. Thank you for your extensive help in this
>matter. So I assume that sio(4) and uart(4) are mutually exclusive of
>each other?
Yes
I've been looking into the efficiency of the caching in dump(8) and
it's abyssmal: After instrumenting dump(8) and looking at its access
patterns, it turns out that it typically reads roughly three times as
much data into its cache as it should, whilst using five times as
much RAM as requested.
Th
At about the time of 2/17/2007 1:12 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
> On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, it does not report as fast.
>
> That means it's getting a "slow" interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
> from what you wrote below).
>
>> Her
On 2007-Feb-16 01:36:41 -0800, Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, it does not report as fast.
That means it's getting a "slow" interrupt handler (or maybe none at all
from what you wrote below).
>Here is the verbose dmesg from a reboot that I did just now:
>
>sio0: Reserved 0x100 bytes f
4 matches
Mail list logo
