Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Martin Turgeon wrote:
Mike Meyer a écrit :
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roman Divacky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
For the record, I believe the nocona cores are:
pentium 4/some prescott, prescott 2m, cedar
2007/6/26, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Martin Turgeon wrote:
Mike Meyer a écrit :
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roman Divacky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
For the record, I believe the nocona cores are:
pentium
Hi,
I have some questions about virtual memory and the freebsd implementation.
I am trying to map in userland (with a syscall like mmap) some
anonymous data (from sockets, files ...).
What's the best way to do this ? There are callbacks in the VM when a
user process tries to access a specific
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Zavam, Vinícius [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
2007/6/26, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mike Meyer wrote:
nowadays).
Intel suggests using -march=prescott (32-bit) and -march=nocona
(64-bit) with gcc on Core2Duo processors and equivalent Xeons.
Note that
Hi..
Last kernel was build at Wed Jun 20 23:20:34 CEST 2007 from head.
At first glance:
1) Channel number is +1.
2) Getting alot of wi0: record read mismatch, rid=fd44, got=8000
Where the got part changes randomly.
3) wi0: xmit failed
4) 'ifconfig wi0 list scan' returns nothing at first run,
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, 17:42-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Hello all,
I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and
they worked just fine, but now I get problems with the same device,
on top of 6.2-STABLE and also 7.0-CURRENT.
[...]
Just for the
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, 15:40-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, 17:42-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Hello all,
I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and
they worked just fine, but now I get problems with the same
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, 17:42-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Hello all,
I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and
they worked just fine, but now I get problems with the same device,
on top of 6.2-STABLE and also 7.0-CURRENT.
[...]
Just for the record: the above
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, 15:40-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, 17:42-0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
Hello all,
I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and
they worked just fine, but now I get problems
[...]
Exactly the same. Did you do anything different from using
securyt/bioapi, securiy/bsp_upektfmess and security/pam_bsdbioapi
and creating birdb.conf?
No, I didn't. It works out of the box.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On 2007-Jun-23 11:01:49 +0300, zkan KIRIK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 - STABLE 200609 gateway have 3 up interfaces.
First one connected to 16Mbps Internet Connection,
Next onet connected to DMZ Zone (192.168.0.0/24 network)
The Last interface connected to Local network.
Martin Turgeon wrote on Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 07:32:22PM -0400:
Hi,
I recently installed AMD64 6.2 Release on 2 PowerEdge servers, both with
dual core Xeon (3070 and 5110).
I extensively benchmarked different compiler options on Xeon 5160 (3.0
GHz Core2) with gcc-4.1.2 and gcc-4.2.
Apart
After deleting a device in devfs, any symlink placed over it results in
ENOENT.
# cd /dev
# rm console
# touch /var/log/console
# ln -s /var/log/console console
# ls -l console
ls: console: No such file or directory
I'd like to fix this behavior. Or is there a reason for it that I'm
I'm having poor luck trying to use NFS over a gigabit ethernet using
jumbo frames. By all indications, my switch (Netgear GS608) forwards
jumbo frames with no difficulty, but my Realtek 8169-based cards seem
unreceptive to the idea, giving many watchdog timeouts and other
obscure log messages.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 05:33:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having poor luck trying to use NFS over a gigabit ethernet using
jumbo frames. By all indications, my switch (Netgear GS608) forwards
jumbo frames with no difficulty, but my Realtek 8169-based cards seem
unreceptive to the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 05:33:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having poor luck trying to use NFS over a gigabit ethernet using
jumbo frames. By all indications, my switch (Netgear GS608) forwards
jumbo frames with no difficulty, but my Realtek 8169-based cards seem
unreceptive to
16 matches
Mail list logo