Reuben A. Popp wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:19, Michael Vince wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Reuben A. Popp wrote:
Hello all,
Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set
to 16 by default?
NFS only supports this much by default (from memory).
Samba (in the gui
Is there any way to get argv[0] for [a particular] process without being root?
After more digging I see sysctl seems to be the way to do this but can I get
the full path to the executable form kinfo_proc?
How does ps do this?
static const char *
getcmdline(pid_t pid)
{
static struct kinfo_p
On 7/19/07, Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for an example that uses kvm_getargv but from just
googling around I can't seem to find an example. Can someone give me a
pointer?
Actually what I'm *really* trying to do is port some code that invokes
GDB to do a backtra
Hello,
I'm looking for an example that uses kvm_getargv but from just
googling around I can't seem to find an example. Can someone give me a
pointer?
Actually what I'm *really* trying to do is port some code that invokes
GDB to do a backtrace and I need to give GDB the path to the
executable of
Rogelio Bastardo wrote:
> I'm looking for some sort of change control solution. On several
> Cacti/Nagios servers, I would like to take a snapshot of what I did, back it
> up, and if something changes, run something that shows me what files /
> permissions were changed since I last worked on the s
I'm looking for some sort of change control solution. On several
Cacti/Nagios servers, I would like to take a snapshot of what I did, back it
up, and if something changes, run something that shows me what files /
permissions were changed since I last worked on the server.
If it were just me, the
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:19, Michael Vince wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Reuben A. Popp wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set
> >> to 16 by default?
> >
> > NFS only supports this much by default (from memory).
> >
> > Samba
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:19:53PM +1000, Michael Vince typed:
>
> I just had to deal with this limitation and it was quite annoying to say
> the least, it appears Samba is somewhat deliberately designed to give
> you a hard time when you run into this limit, because as soon as you add
> a user
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:11:47
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007
> > 19:46:11 -0500):
> >
> >> I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:16:56
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007
> > 19:46:11 -0500):
> >> It seems to me that the cure is to slightly change "make
> >> actual-package
Stephen Montgomery-Smith:
> If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but
> after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that
> require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up
> programs like portmanager. There is a sense in wh
11 matches
Mail list logo
