Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
APSL is not generally accepted in the base. It may be acceptable in
certain circumstances, but strong technical justification is generally
required for inclusion.
Which brings us to my reaction to the PR, which is why do we even need
this?
Stick it in
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's a significant testament to the quality of the Solaris
parts we've been pulling in (ZFS, DTrace) that CDDL parts are now in
the base tree. They are carefully marked and isolated to make it easy
to build CDDL-free systems in the same way that
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:40:21 -0700
Bert JW Regeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 08:46 , Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
Attached file causes segfaults on freebsd 4,5,6
but keeps alive in linux.
IANIAML, so please CC me explicitly.
Thanks!
You did not attach any files.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:40:09AM +0200, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:40:21 -0700
Bert JW Regeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 08:46 , Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
Attached file causes segfaults on freebsd 4,5,6
but keeps alive in linux.
Please ignore my previous post.
I was having problem because I didn't allocate memory to my_data_copy.
Also, the correct usage is:
m_copydata( m, 0, m-m_pkthdr.len , (caddr_t) my_data_copy);
thanks
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Biks N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, thanks to everyone for
5 matches
Mail list logo
