On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:23:19PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with GENERIC on a AMD XP Athlon 3500+ with
> 1267 MB of ram, and a GigBit NIC. I am testing out ZFS just for the hell of
> it, I know, 32 bit is not suggested and runs badly, but it does what it
>
On Mar 24, 2008, at 19:46 , Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:23:19PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
Hey guys,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with GENERIC on a AMD XP Athlon
3500+ with
1267 MB of ram, and a GigBit NIC. I am testing out ZFS just for the
hell of
it, I know, 32
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:23:19PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I am running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with GENERIC on a AMD XP Athlon 3500+ with
> 1267 MB of ram, and a GigBit NIC. I am testing out ZFS just for the hell of
> it, I know, 32 bit is not suggested and runs badly, but it d
On Mar 24, 2008, at 16:23 , Bert JW Regeer wrote:
Hey guys,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with GENERIC on a AMD XP Athlon
3500+ with 1267 MB of ram, and a GigBit NIC. I am testing out ZFS
just for the hell of it, I know, 32 bit is not suggested and runs
badly, but it does what it needs
Hey guys,
I am running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE with GENERIC on a AMD XP Athlon 3500+
with 1267 MB of ram, and a GigBit NIC. I am testing out ZFS just for
the hell of it, I know, 32 bit is not suggested and runs badly, but it
does what it needs to do.
I was copying large amounts of data for ba
here are some of my ideas for ipfw changes:
1/ redo locking so that packets do not have to get locks on the
structure... I have several ideas on this
2/ allow separate firewalls to be used at different parts of the
network stack (i.e allow multiple taboe sto co-exist)
3/ possibly keeping pe
On Friday 21 March 2008 04:03:19 pm Kai Wang wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm working on a BSD Licensed objcopy/strip rewrite(in p4) based on
> libelf, I really want to know the answers to a few questions listed
> below, and please do not hesitate if you have other related
> suggestions. Thanks in advanc
On Saturday 22 March 2008 11:20:07 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
> M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : The vkernel feature has certainly benefits, e.g. the fact
> > : that you can attach to it with standard gdb
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
>
> 2.5. Just to mention: modip, counter limits, fragments.
>
> These patches are already currently discussed in ipfw@, but included
> here just to not forget. These are "modip" action, allowing to modify IP
> header (DSCP, ToS, TTL) and corresponding match rule options, and
9 matches
Mail list logo
