Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
At present day my central FWs are simply standard 2 boxes (each one cost
1000 euros aprox); I remember the Juniper guy offering me a
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
At present day my central FWs are simply standard 2 boxes (each
I'm amazed at the fact that people are actually comparing FreeBSD with
pf to Juniper routers. I've a bit of experience with M20s and M40s, and
I can assure you they're VERY different than a little x86 PC routing
packets, and are significantly faster due to hardware routing.
For example, you
Hello,
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
what makes me worry is that the problem was raised in 5.4-RC3 in 2005
and still exists in 7.0R
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
At present day my central FWs are simply
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
I'm just wondering what happens if you enforce a rescan
on the (virtual)
Hi List,
I am running into a weird issue. On a 6.2 stable, 32bits built with options
MAC,
I can run pkg_add of anything. But a 6.2 stable, 64bits built with MAC won't
let
me do pkg_add. If anybody has an input, please advise. Below is the output
on the 64 bits machine:
net3# pkg_add test.tbz
On (06/08/2008 19:29), Oliver Fromme wrote:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
Situation here is somewhat
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like to
increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
In Solaris 10 the Services Management Facility (SMF) was introduced.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like to
increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
In Solaris 10
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator.
I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like
to
increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
In Solaris
Hello
my trouble with nic
part of `dmesg` output
-
em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.5 port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
0xfebc-0xfebd,0xfeb8-0xfebb irq 19 at device 2.0 on pci2
em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is
0n Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 07:14:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to submit the idea of implementing a similar environment
into FreeBSD. After looking through the developers links and googling I
found no project for FreeBSD that implemented anything similar to this.
Hello
my trouble with nic
part of `dmesg` output
-
em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.5 port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
0xfebc-0xfebd,0xfeb8-0xfebb irq 19 at device 2.0 on pci2
em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 08:34:44AM +0400, Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
Hello
my trouble with nic
part of `dmesg` output
-
em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.5 port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:34:51 -0400
Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I
16 matches
Mail list logo
