On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:42:49 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:41:11 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:53:38PM +0300, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:07:44PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:42:49 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Fri, 10
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:42:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Little time ago I was misleaded by the certain people and got an
idea that VirtualBox actually works on FreeBSD, so I've made a draft
port for it. It doesn't actually work, but since I've spent several
hours hacking it and made
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:42:49 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:41:11 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:42:49 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:41:11 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:To Matt:
: since 'small' nowadays is big enough to hold /, what advantages are
there
:in having root split up?
:also, having this split personality, what if the disk goes? the hammer/zfs
:is probably raided ...
You mean /boot + root , or do you mean /root vs /usr vs /home? I'll
On 10/11/08, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With regards to the traditional BSD partitioning scheme, having a
separate /usr, /home, /tmp, etc... there's no reason to do that stuff
any more with ZFS (or HAMMER).
As separate partitions, no. As separate filesystems,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Matt,
Matthew Dillon wrote:
[...]
/boot can be as complex as boot2 allows. There's nothing preventing
it from being RAIDed if boot2 supported that, and there's nothing
preventing it (once you had ZFS boot capabilities) from being
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
FWIW, my system is amd64 with 1 G of memory, which the page implies is
insufficient. Is it really?
This may be purely subjective, as I have never bench marked the speeds,
but
when I was first testing zfs on a i386 machine with 1gig ram,
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Yuri wrote:
Let's say I have signal(3) handler set.
And I know exactly what instruction caused SEGV and why.
Is there a way to access from signal handler CPU registers as they
were before signal, modify some of them, clear the signal and
continue from the instruction that
10 matches
Mail list logo
