> Any objections against the general concept? It's rather complicated to get
> the apparent size of a directory hierarchy without scripting. I often wonder
> if some hierarchy will fit on a CD/DVD and compressed zfs makes this really
> difficult.
It's a definite thumbs up from me - this is ex
Nate Eldredge wrote:
> sh prog1 > tmpfile &
tail -f -c +0 tmpfile | sh prog2
BTW, I don't think this would solve my problem as tail -f would block
waiting for more data, as would prog2, so after prog1 finishes writing
data they would block indefinitely on input. I forgot to mention this
was
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:12:34 -0700, "Steve Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's alot of good info. It should go in the porter's handbook,
> maybe...
Hi Steve,
Probably not. What I wrote is specific to the GNU build system. We
have many ports that use configure scripts and makefiles gener
3 matches
Mail list logo