Hi,
On 22 Nov 2008, at 11:00, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
Since the underlying OS of Mac OS is FreeBSD I'm wondering whether
itr is possible to mount a
.dmg file as it is used in Apple software distribution for the Mac
OS. I would like to install an
Apple iPhone configuration utility on my Free
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Which version of FreeBSD was used in OSX will almost certainly depend on
which version of MacOS X you look at.
It is quite possible that the latest version of OSX uses code from FreeBSD
5.x, but I guarantee that the first release of OSX did not. (This
On Sun, 23 de Noviembre de 2008, 5:22 am, Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov 2008, at 11:00, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>> Since the underlying OS of Mac OS is FreeBSD I'm wondering whether
>> itr is possible to mount a
>> .dmg file as it is used in Apple software distribution for the Mac
>> OS. I woul
Hello Hackers,
I noticed something the other day that I thought was a bit weird. I had
a
high amount of HD activity, so I wanted to see who was on my machine. I tried
using the "who" command and received no information (not even for myself).
I have found that various methods
On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hello Hackers,
I noticed something the other day that I thought was a bit weird. I
had a
high amount of HD activity, so I wanted to see who was on my
machine. I tried
using the "who" command and received no information (not even for
m
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
>
> `who' works perfectly fine for me on CURRENT/AMD64 synced up 3 days
> ago, via an ssh terminal. Can you provide more details, e.g. when was
> your las
Hello there. I just hit into "problem" that built-in sh command type
outputs to stdout when error occurs. I mean it returns non-0 status,
but outputs to stdout! I think stderr has been made exactly for such
purposes and `type' should use it in case of error .. what do you
think?
thanks
--
lg
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
>> > Hello Hackers,
>> >
>
>
>>
>> `who' works perfectly fine for me on CURRENT/AMD64 synced up 3
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:42:08 you wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> >> > Hello Hackers,
> >
> >
> >
> >> `who
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:15:54 -0600 (CST)
Braulio José Solano Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an innocent question. I have read on the handbook and the thesis
> about the Linux ABI technical explanations that lead me to think that it
> could be possible to run Mac OS binaries on FreeBSD.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Mike Meyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--snip--
> So while a Darwin (the OS underneath OSX) ABI would be possible -
> though it's not clear how painful because it's not clear how visible
> the MACH APIs are - it's not clear how useful it would be by
> itself. You cou
11 matches
Mail list logo
