Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to man 2 write, means
`` [EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was
negative.'', as you can see below it is not true, I have tried
different block sizes, with same result.
How
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to man 2 write, means
`` [EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was
negative.'', as you can see below it is not true, I
2009/1/26 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to man 2 write, means
`` [EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
2009/1/26 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to man 2 write, means
``
Lukasz Jaroszewski schrieb:
2009/1/26 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to man 2 write, means
`` [EINVAL] The pointer
2009/1/26 Christoph Mallon christoph.mal...@gmx.de:
Lukasz Jaroszewski schrieb:
2009/1/26 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
after opening /dev/ad4 with success for O_RDWR, I am getting [EINVAL]
from write(2), which according to
Doug Barton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
However, I think cmp wouldn't work here, because cmp only
detects whether there is a difference between two files.
In this case we need to know if one file is a subset of
the other: For every hash there must be a .gz file, but
it
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
2009/1/26 Christoph Mallon christoph.mal...@gmx.de:
Lukasz Jaroszewski schrieb:
2009/1/26 Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net:
On Monday 26 January 2009, Lukasz Jaroszewski wrote:
Hi,
It would be helpful, if you showed the actual
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:42:56AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, David Schultz wrote:
I think there *is* a real bug here, but there's two distinct ways
to fix it. When a threaded process forks, malloc acquires all its
locks so that its state is consistent after a fork.
Hi there!
I thought I finally had a motherboard using one of the Marvell SATA/
PATA chips coming in, but unfortunately the delivery has been
postponed to some unspecified date, oh well..
Thats where you come into the picture as I'd like to get another one,
but finding boards that uses
On Friday 21 December 2007 3:16:33 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:11:24AM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Carl Shapiro wrote:
The default setting of the x87 floating point control
11 matches
Mail list logo
