Hi Adrian,
I am not sure, but I didnt think ZFS 13 was ever going to be merged into
7-stable. I thought the kernel memory requirements were to great (just going
back in my memory on that one). Also, I think there are still a few bugs
left with the zil being enabled (and/or prefetch) causing
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
The real fix involves rewriting chunks of the libwrap code, or finding
a version where someone has already done so.
It doesn't seem like it should be too bad. xgets is only called in three
places. It wou
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
The real fix involves rewriting chunks of the libwrap code, or finding
a version where someone has already done so.
It doesn't seem like it should be too bad. xgets is only called in three
places. It would be easy enough to replace it with someth
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Chris St Denis wrote:
I think I've found a bug in libwrap/tcpwrappers.
I think so too :) See below.
Before filing an actual bug report I want to get some feedback here
first.
A hosts.allow file with ~1000 ips on a single line (Haven't experimented with
othe
Hi Pawel,
Coming back to the subject, when do you think we might have a merge of
r185029 (import of ZFS version 13) from head back into -stable ?
Is there anything we can help with to speed up the process (e.g. testing)
?
PS: ZFS-FUSE on Linux has also reached v 13...
Thank you,
Adrian Penis
5 matches
Mail list logo
