Kostik Belousov wrote:
I looked at the issue once more recently, and I propose the following
much less intrusive patch. It is somewhat hackish, but I think that
it would be good to have this working. Most other Unixes do have
working thread library after the fork. Any objections ?
diff --git a/l
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 16:49:19 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
If I have a dual boot system w/ Vista on the first slices and all the
FreeBSD filesystems on the second and then run gmirror on the disk will
the mirror disk also have the Vista slice?
Yes, gmirror is block l
I just set up mirroring on my dual boot fb-7.1/vistaX32SP1 machine (the
dual boot works fine) but I got this message when I attempted to mount
vista via sysutils/fusefs-ntfs:
Actual VCN (0x336970100) of index buffer is different from expected
VCN (0x1).
Failed to mount '/dev/mirror/gm0s1'
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I looked at the issue once more recently, and I propose the following
much less intrusive patch. It is somewhat hackish, but I think that
it would be good to have this working. Most other Unixes do have
working thread library after the fork. Any object
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:42:56AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, David Schultz wrote:
>
> >I think there *is* a real bug here, but there's two distinct ways
> >to fix it. When a threaded process forks, malloc acquires all its
> >locks so that its state is consistent after a f
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 16:49:19 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> If I have a dual boot system w/ Vista on the first slices and all the
> FreeBSD filesystems on the second and then run gmirror on the disk will
> the mirror disk also have the Vista slice?
Yes, gmirror is block level and has no knowl
If I have a dual boot system w/ Vista on the first slices and all the
FreeBSD filesystems on the second and then run gmirror on the disk will
the mirror disk also have the Vista slice?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
I would like to report that I am no longer seeing the issue in the subject line.
The problem was fixed by the recent commits of jhb ( I tested stable/7).
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
ZFS version list [was ETA for ZFS ver: n]
I needed raw, bit reliable, stable, encrypted storage. ZFS gave all
but the last part so far. None of the features since v6 were useful
to me. And as with most software, there are surely tons of fixes
and optimizations being handled silently that are usefu
9 matches
Mail list logo
