How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity left on the machine.
Ideally would like to double at least the number of ttys available,
any help would be most appreciated.
I knew his sounded very familiar, seems I asked the same
question back in 2007 for 5.4 just it was capped at 256:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-hackers/2007-October/021852.html
I'm sure I also remember saying this limit had been removed in 7.x
but looking in the source for
Attached is a patch that adds filesystem orphaning. What it means,
from the user point of view, is that when a disk device containing mounted
filesystem gets removed from the system, all filesystem operations return
immediately with an error, contents of the filesystem become invisible
and
Hi Steven,
* Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity left on the machine.
Ideally would like to double at least the
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Steven,
* Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
How can I increase the maximum number or ptys available on FreeBSD 7.0?
It seems that currently the machine is maxing out at 512 but there is
still loads of capacity
Hi Kostik,
* Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we switch to %x ? Or even, use some radix encoding of the number,
to allow alphabetical symbols too ?
I guess that would break a lot of existing libraries. For example: older
RELENG_7/CURRENT libcs might still use TIOCGPTN. This ioctl
* Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
I also thought about that, but the risks are probably too high. I think
it's better to just redesign our utmp/wtmp/lastlog system. I guess we
could do something like this:
I forgot one step:
- Implement utmpx. At first utmpx should just be a set of wrappers
Hi!
I'm trying to set up wifi access point using my FreeBSD box and
hostapd deamon. My goal is running EAP-TTLS server. It seems that the
version shipped with base system isn't compiled with options allowing
to use EAP server (I'm using 7.0 version but the same is with the
latest 8.0 snapshot). I
Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote:
Attached is a patch that adds filesystem orphaning. ...
I'm little short of time, so I won't be able to work on it anytime soon.
If you like the idea - please do whatever is needed to get it to commitable
state.
This is funny: the filesystem orphaning patch is
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:08:35PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Kostik,
* Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we switch to %x ? Or even, use some radix encoding of the number,
to allow alphabetical symbols too ?
I guess that would break a lot of existing libraries. For
Daamn M wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to set up wifi access point using my FreeBSD box and
hostapd deamon. My goal is running EAP-TTLS server. It seems that the
version shipped with base system isn't compiled with options allowing
to use EAP server (I'm using 7.0 version but the same is with the
latest
Hi!
I have a question about -pthread. Imagine the situation where one port
installs shared library that uses threads, and other port links with
this library. A question: should the second port explicitely add
-pthread to linker flags?
For example, graphics/ilmbase is built with pthread support
On 0401T1428, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Attached is a patch that adds filesystem orphaning. ...
I'm little short of time, so I won't be able to work on it anytime soon.
If you like the idea - please do whatever is needed to get it to commitable
state.
This is funny: the filesystem
I have a domain that I just transfered from dreamhost and there are
already some email accounts set up on it that are forwarded to gmail but
there are also other accounts that are local accounts my question is
there a easy way to say if it is not a local account forward/use as MX
gmail?
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I have a question about -pthread. Imagine the situation where one port
installs shared library that uses threads, and other port links with
this library. A question: should the second port explicitely add
-pthread to linker flags?
Yes.
For
Gregory Shapiro wrote:
I have a domain that I just transfered from dreamhost and there are
already some email accounts set up on it that are forwarded to gmail but
there are also other accounts that are local accounts my question is
there a easy way to say if it is not a local account
I was aware of that but wanted a default alias for any addr/alias that
does not exist to send to gmail and alias(5) does not allow for wild
cards and/or defaults it seems
You can add this to your .mc file:
define(`LUSER_RELAY', `local:unknownuser')
and then alias 'unknownuser' to the
Gregory Shapiro wrote:
I was aware of that but wanted a default alias for any addr/alias that
does not exist to send to gmail and alias(5) does not allow for wild
cards and/or defaults it seems
You can add this to your .mc file:
define(`LUSER_RELAY', `local:unknownuser')
and then
I have a domain that I just transfered from dreamhost and there are
already some email accounts set up on it that are forwarded to gmail but
there are also other accounts that are local accounts my question is
there a easy way to say if it is not a local account forward/use as MX
Maybe I misread but both of those features (I have used the second but
not the first) seem to be all or nothing forwarders (i.e. x...@domain is
forwarded for all xxx not just some xxx)
LUSER_RELAY is only for unknown users. If you user virtusertable,
you'll need to list out all valid
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:53:06PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
You can increase the maximum amount of PTYs by editing a lot of source
files on your system. There is some good news: in -CURRENT we switched
to Unix98-style PTYs (/dev/pts/%u). Right now the maximum amount of PTYs
21 matches
Mail list logo
