On Saturday 11 April 2009 5:03:58 pm Andrew Brampton wrote:
> 2009/4/11 Robert Watson :
> > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Andrew Brampton wrote:
> >
> > Your understanding is mostly right. The missing bit is this: there are
two
> > kinds of interrupt contexts -- fast/filter interrupt handlers, which
borr
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 9:14:26 pm Sergey Babkin wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On Monday 06 April 2009 11:12:33 pm Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> > > Anyway, as far as I can tell, it's only the base register of
> > > the simulated DEC21140 device that has this issue, so it's
> > > quite possibl
on 13/04/2009 18:48 Sean Bruno said the following:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Smart self test never completing.
>
> The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete?
Yes, exactly. Even for the short one, which is supposed to complete in 1 minute:
$ smartctl -t sh
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Smart self test never completing.
The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete?
Sean
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
on 12/04/2009 22:02 Sean Bruno said the following:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354
>>
>> Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening?
>>
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo