Re: FreeBSD memguard + spinlocks

2009-04-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday 11 April 2009 5:03:58 pm Andrew Brampton wrote: > 2009/4/11 Robert Watson : > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Andrew Brampton wrote: > > > > Your understanding is mostly right.  The missing bit is this: there are two > > kinds of interrupt contexts -- fast/filter interrupt handlers, which borr

Re: Patch for MS Hyper V (virtualization)

2009-04-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 9:14:26 pm Sergey Babkin wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Monday 06 April 2009 11:12:33 pm Sergey Babkin wrote: > > > > Anyway, as far as I can tell, it's only the base register of > > > the simulated DEC21140 device that has this issue, so it's > > > quite possibl

Re: smart self-test vs 7200.12/ich9r/ahci

2009-04-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 13/04/2009 18:48 Sean Bruno said the following: > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Smart self test never completing. > > The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete? Yes, exactly. Even for the short one, which is supposed to complete in 1 minute: $ smartctl -t sh

Re: smart self-test vs 7200.12/ich9r/ahci

2009-04-13 Thread Sean Bruno
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:06 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Smart self test never completing. The "self-test" never goes beyond "90%" complete? Sean ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To

Re: smart self-test vs 7200.12/ich9r/ahci

2009-04-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/04/2009 22:02 Sean Bruno said the following: > On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do: >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354 >> >> Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening? >> > >