On 11 Jun 2009, at 02:43, Yuri wrote:
Quoting Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com:
By chance, are you running an out-of-sync kernel / userland? You say
the kernel is from May 6, and in the subject is 7.2-PRERELEASE. 7.2
was -RELEASEd on May 3.
I just updated to more recent 72-STABLE and
Hello,
There are two ways to managed a RNG in FreeBSD, I'm asking which is the
best:
- feed the random subsystem via random_harvest(9)
- add the RNG to random(4) as the Nehemiah RNG (VIA padlock)
In fact, i do not understand why the Nehemiah RNG is not managed by
padlock(4).
Thanks, regards.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:17, Ed Schoutene...@80386.nl wrote:
* Pawel Worach pawel.wor...@gmail.com wrote:
So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did
3 matches
Mail list logo