vm: kvm_free max_wired

2009-10-19 Thread grarpamp
Is this telling me I should be able to set kmem_size to around 740MiB before the kernel panics during boot? Any runtime issues with doing that? # sysctl hw.physmem hw.realmem vm.kvm_size vm.kvm_free vm.kmem_size hw.physmem: 1055293440 hw.realmem: 1072627712 vm.kvm_size: 1073737728 vm.kvm_free: 205

Re: SB7xx watchdog: new driver for review and testing

2009-10-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/10/2009 18:47 Rui Paulo said the following: > On 19 Oct 2009, at 16:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> >> I have put updated version of the driver (C file only) here: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/amdsbwd.c > > Looks good to me. Thank you for the review and the help! I have now produced a di

FreeBSD DAQ Card Facility [DCF]

2009-10-19 Thread Manuel Gebele
Hi folks, some time ago, I decided to start working on an FreeBSD implementation for data acquisition support. Now I've published a very first Pre-Alpha version of the project. To become a more precisely overview take a look at http://freebsd-dcf.sourceforge.net/ Please notice that the projec

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/10/19 Alex Kozlov : > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:35:08PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) > >> > > >> > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps > >> > it would

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Ivan Voras
2009/10/19 Alex Kozlov : > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:35:08PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) >> > >> > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps >> > it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1] >> > >>

Re: SB7xx watchdog: new driver for review and testing

2009-10-19 Thread Rui Paulo
On 19 Oct 2009, at 16:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: I have put updated version of the driver (C file only) here: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/amdsbwd.c Looks good to me. -- Rui Paulo ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: SB7xx watchdog: new driver for review and testing

2009-10-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
I have put updated version of the driver (C file only) here: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/amdsbwd.c Please let me know how it looks now. Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Alex Kozlov
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 04:35:08PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) > > > > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps > > it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1] > > > > Anyway, the feature looks nice!

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Ivan Voras
Ivan Voras wrote: I have a small patch that makes "make" display percentage complete in process title, which can be retrieved in "top" in the form of: 71466 root 1 760 7008K 5696K select 0 0:00 0.00% make: 95% (55 more targets out of 1360) (make) Also: is there someone

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Ivan Voras
2009/10/19 Rink Springer : > Hi Ivan, > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >> if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) > > I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps > it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1] > > A

Re: Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Rink Springer
Hi Ivan, On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > if nobody objects, I'll commit it :) I seem to recall that setproctitle() is quite expensive to call; perhaps it would make sense offer a flag to prevent make(1) from calling it? [1] Anyway, the feature looks nice! I'd like t

Make process title - % complete

2009-10-19 Thread Ivan Voras
I have a small patch that makes "make" display percentage complete in process title, which can be retrieved in "top" in the form of: 71466 root 1 760 7008K 5696K select 0 0:00 0.00% make: 95% (55 more targets out of 1360) (make) The patch is here and I'm inviting review

Re: namei (via firmware_get(9)) from taskq in 7.x

2009-10-19 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kostik Belousov wrote: It seems that you want a merge of r178042,183614,184842,188057 (one of Yes, I finally figured this out on Fri. I probably should have posted a response to this thread to avoid others wasting time on this. Drew ___ freebsd-ha

Re: SB7xx watchdog: new driver for review and testing

2009-10-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/10/2009 14:17 Rui Paulo said the following: > On 18 Oct 2009, at 21:10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Please review and/or test a new driver for watchdog driver included >> into AMD SB7xx: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/amdsbwd.tgz >> I have tested this driver only with SB700 on Gigabyte GA-MA

Re: SB7xx watchdog: new driver for review and testing

2009-10-19 Thread Rui Paulo
On 18 Oct 2009, at 21:10, Andriy Gapon wrote: Please review and/or test a new driver for watchdog driver included into AMD SB7xx: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/amdsbwd.tgz I have tested this driver only with SB700 on Gigabyte GA-MA780G-UD3H motherboard. ichwd driver was used as a starting