There's a bunch of other random crap that may be going on relating to
the helper processes (eg rewriters, auth, etc) which may also be
restarted.
Anyway. The thread is about superpage demotion and copying, not what
Squid is or isn't doing in her configuration. :)
Adrian
2009/11/27 Daniel O'Con
Hi,
I have just set up an ntop server based on 8.0-RELEASE.
FreeBSD ntop 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:48:17 UTC 2009
r...@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
After installing ntop 1.3.10 and all dependencies from the ports ntop
did work, but when ru
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
Hi,
objdump -h shows that most, but not all, KLDs on amd64 have a "set_pcpu"
section of size 0. Why? What is the difference between having a 0
sized set_pcpu vs. not having it at all?
The kernel linker considers the alignment requirements of these e
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> There's a bunch of other random crap that may be going on relating to
> the helper processes (eg rewriters, auth, etc) which may also be
> restarted.
OK.
> Anyway. The thread is about superpage demotion and copying, not what
> Squid is or isn't doing in
Hello,
I face some misunderstood situation related to the access permissions.
There is a program(script) with the suid/sgid (mode 6555):
r-sr-sr-x fuser:proggroup theprog
There is a file:
rw-rw someone:filegroupthefile
User 'fuser' (==program euid) have primary group 'filegroup'
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:19:11AM +0100, Henner Morten Kruse wrote:
> I have just set up an ntop server based on 8.0-RELEASE.
> FreeBSD ntop 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:48:17 UTC 2009
> r...@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
> After installing nto
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:51:41AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >objdump -h shows that most, but not all, KLDs on amd64 have a "set_pcpu"
> >section of size 0. Why? What is the difference between having a 0
> >sized set_pcpu vs. not havin
Hi,
I am trying to figure out why java fails to start with 1024MB of heap on
i386 with 4GB of RAM and 4GB of swap. Both MAXDSIZ and DFLDSIZ are set
to 2GB. Here is my limits:
Resource limits (current):
cputime infinity secs
filesize infinity kB
datasize 2097152
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I am trying to figure out why java fails to start with 1024MB of heap on
i386 with 4GB of RAM and 4GB of swap. Both MAXDSIZ and DFLDSIZ are set
to 2GB.
Some memory (1GiB?) is reserved for kernel address space, and you
reserved 2GiB for DSS. That leaves less than 1GiB ava
Jason Evans wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I am trying to figure out why java fails to start with 1024MB of heap
on i386 with 4GB of RAM and 4GB of swap. Both MAXDSIZ and DFLDSIZ are
set to 2GB.
Some memory (1GiB?) is reserved for kernel address space, and you
reserved 2GiB for DSS. That leave
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Jason Evans wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I am trying to figure out why java fails to start with 1024MB of heap
on i386 with 4GB of RAM and 4GB of swap. Both MAXDSIZ and DFLDSIZ are
set to 2GB.
Some memory (1GiB?) is reserved for kernel address space, and you
reserved 2Gi
Jason Evans wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Jason Evans wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I am trying to figure out why java fails to start with 1024MB of
heap on i386 with 4GB of RAM and 4GB of swap. Both MAXDSIZ and
DFLDSIZ are set to 2GB.
Some memory (1GiB?) is reserved for kernel address space, a
12 matches
Mail list logo