8.0-RELEASE-p1 Panic "panic: sbdrop"

This is a new one on me: panic: sbdrop cpuid = 3 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a panic() at panic+0x182 sbdrop_internal() at sbdrop_internal+0x323 soisdisconnected() at soisdisconnected+0xbe tcp_close() at tcp_close+0x45 tcp_do_segment() at tcp_do_segmen

Re: ZFS, compression, system load, pauses (livelocks?)

2009/12/15 Ivan Voras : > The context of this post is file servers running FreeBSD 8 and ZFS with > compressed file systems on low-end hardware, or actually high-end hardware > on VMWare ESX 3.5 and 4, which kind of makes it low-end as far as storage is > concerned. The servers are standby backup m

Re: Email sent from "at" command going to the wrong account

Nate, Thank you for your reply, On 12/14/2009 12:20 PM, Nate Eldredge wrote: On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Holger Kunst wrote: The "at" command sends an email with the output of the scheduled job. I've experienced inconsistent results when running jobs, receiving emails in accounts not associated with

Re: ZFS, compression, system load, pauses (livelocks?)

2009/12/15 Wiktor Niesiobedzki : > 2009/12/15 Ivan Voras : >> The context of this post is file servers running FreeBSD 8 and ZFS with >> compressed file systems on low-end hardware, or actually high-end hardware >> on VMWare ESX 3.5 and 4, which kind of makes it low-end as far as storage is >> conc

Re: ZFS, compression, system load, pauses (livelocks?)

2009/12/15 Ivan Voras : > I have tried before reducing priority of ZFS taskqueues but only to > PRIBIO, not below it - not much effect wrt "pauses". I was testing with getting the thread as low priority as PUSER (with original pjd@ patch) and it was actually performing better than the current solu