This is a new one on me:
panic: sbdrop
cpuid = 3
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a
panic() at panic+0x182
sbdrop_internal() at sbdrop_internal+0x323
soisdisconnected() at soisdisconnected+0xbe
tcp_close() at tcp_close+0x45
tcp_do_segment() at tcp_do_segmen
2009/12/15 Ivan Voras :
> The context of this post is file servers running FreeBSD 8 and ZFS with
> compressed file systems on low-end hardware, or actually high-end hardware
> on VMWare ESX 3.5 and 4, which kind of makes it low-end as far as storage is
> concerned. The servers are standby backup m
Nate,
Thank you for your reply,
On 12/14/2009 12:20 PM, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Holger Kunst wrote:
The "at" command sends an email with the output of the scheduled job.
I've experienced inconsistent results when running jobs, receiving
emails in accounts not associated with
2009/12/15 Wiktor Niesiobedzki :
> 2009/12/15 Ivan Voras :
>> The context of this post is file servers running FreeBSD 8 and ZFS with
>> compressed file systems on low-end hardware, or actually high-end hardware
>> on VMWare ESX 3.5 and 4, which kind of makes it low-end as far as storage is
>> conc
2009/12/15 Ivan Voras :
> I have tried before reducing priority of ZFS taskqueues but only to
> PRIBIO, not below it - not much effect wrt "pauses".
I was testing with getting the thread as low priority as PUSER (with
original pjd@ patch) and it was actually performing better than the
current solu
5 matches
Mail list logo