On Tuesday 05 January 2010 9:17:22 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote:
Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7.
On Thursday 07 January 2010 4:17:52 pm Mark Tinguely wrote:
In the user space case of bus_dmamap_load_uio(), the calling thread is
stored in uio-uio_td, in which the user's pmap can be determined.
The ARM processor, with the possible exception of the ARMv7 MPcore
with snoop control unit,
You should use the pmap from the thread in the uio structure. Similar to
this from the x86 bus_dma code:
if (uio-uio_segflg == UIO_USERSPACE) {
KASSERT(uio-uio_td != NULL,
(bus_dmamap_load_uio: USERSPACE but no proc));
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:31:11AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Thoughts?
INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL?
Well, I was interested in knowing which config was being used, not so
much what the name of the subdirectory in /boot was going to be.
(Default value for
On Friday 08 January 2010 9:14:36 am Mark Tinguely wrote:
You should use the pmap from the thread in the uio structure. Similar to
this from the x86 bus_dma code:
if (uio-uio_segflg == UIO_USERSPACE) {
KASSERT(uio-uio_td != NULL,
On Wed, 06.01.2010 at 16:27:09 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Because when you erase something, all it does is unlink (delete the
reference to) the data. So there is currently no way the memory disk can
free
the memory associated with the data. That is also why
Hi all,
This patch implements the filesystems file in the linux proc fs.
I have used it for some time without seeing any problems. Let me
know in case this is useful.
Tested against 8.0-RELEASE-p1
Thanks
patch.linprocfs.filesystems
Description: Binary data
The first time in a while be we just had nginx get stuck in the zoneli
state:
51630 www 1 -160 16616K 9396K zoneli 2 24:33 0.00% nginx
51627 www 1 -160 16616K 9376K zoneli 1 24:22 0.00% nginx
51629 www 1 -160 16616K 9372K zoneli 3 24:09 0.00% nginx
Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 06.01.2010 at 16:27:09 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Because when you erase something, all it does is unlink (delete the
reference to) the data. So there is currently no way the memory disk can free
the memory associated with the data.
9 matches
Mail list logo