On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:56:39AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:21:16PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > >
> > > Just asking opinions, if people want this, I'll make a patch and
> > > file a PR.
> > >
> >
> > Is this script correct?
>
> We're starting to use SSDs for boot drive
Hi All,
I have a pager monitoring system built on FreeBSD 6.4 that uses the
ltmdm driver.
(ltmdm is a "controllerless winmodem")
I was looking into updating to FreeBSD 8 and I see that ltmdm and
hcfmdm are now
both broken. hcfmdm broke on FreeBSD 7 but it is easily patched to
build on tha
> then they rightly passes sched_idletd(). Any scheduler may define its
> own version of sched_idletd().
Oops, youre right, I was just unable to read at the end of the day on Friday.
Thanks!
matthew
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
2010/4/24 Matthew Fleming :
> I'm looking at kern_idle.c in stable/7 and I don't quite follow how idle
> threads work. The kthread_create(9) call does not pass in a function
> pointer, so what code does a processor run when there is no other
> runnable thread?
In STABLE_7:
...
#ifdef SMP
I'm looking at kern_idle.c in stable/7 and I don't quite follow how idle
threads work. The kthread_create(9) call does not pass in a function
pointer, so what code does a processor run when there is no other
runnable thread?
Thanks,
matthew
___
freebsd-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> - use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
>> For what?
>> For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
>> access they are the s
On Friday 23 April 2010 17:40:12 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > > - use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
> >
> > For what?
> > For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
> > access they are the same s
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:18:46PM +0300, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > - use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
>
> For what?
> For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
> access they are the same speed (forgetting look-ahead caching). For
> random access matrix is fa
on 22/04/2010 18:04 RevLin Software said the following:
> Hello All
>
> My name is Patrick Quinn
>
> I am currently part of a team working on a new operating system called
> RevLin OS. RevLin OS will use a new desktop environment called RaVe that is
> coded almost entirely in web language (Css ht
> Quoting Equixen- (from Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:05:12 +0530):
>
>> Hello!
>> I am a 3rd year B.Tech (Computer Science) student. I want to
>> participate in some open source project during my summer vacations.
>>
>> I thought about going the Google summer of code way but due to limited
>> knowledge an
> - use a matrix is faster than use a linked list?
For what?
For insertion and deletion no - linked list is faster. For sequential
access they are the same speed (forgetting look-ahead caching). For
random access matrix is faster.
___
freebsd-hackers@fre
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> The patch:
>
> Index: lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c
> ===
> --- lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c (revision 206760)
> +++ lib/libc/nls/msgcat.c (working copy)
> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:17:36PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> The changes to use NLS for strerror sometimes cause one of my virtual
> machines to deadlock. This virtual machine runs 9-CURRENT, acquires its
> IP address via DHCP (virtualbox host-only networking), has no default
> route and has
Aryeh M. Friedman writes:
> I acciddentally rm'ed my /var/db/pkg and want to know is it
> possible to rgenerate it (I have portmaster and portupgrade
> installed)
(I'm assuming you have _completely_ deleted the contents of
/var/db/pkg.)
If you have not deleted /usr/ports/distf
The changes to use NLS for strerror sometimes cause one of my virtual
machines to deadlock. This virtual machine runs 9-CURRENT, acquires its
IP address via DHCP (virtualbox host-only networking), has no default
route and has /usr/local and /usr/home NFS mounted.
When the DHCP lease expires such a
On Friday 23 April 2010 2:50:15 am Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:41:27PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Ulrich Spörlein, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I have a .hg directory sitting in / for every machine I usually take
> > care of. hgignore is of course set to *, so only ex
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> > Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi hack...@freebsd.org
> > > > with amd64, but not with i386,
> > > > /sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC COMPAT_FREEBSD7 is an undocemneted
> > > > pre-requisite for COMPAT_IA32
> > > >
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:38:14 -0700
Steve Franks wrote:
> > It's much safer to just leave the libraries alone. __Just because you
> > upgraded libpng doesn't mean that your old gtk binary will stop working
> > (assuming you are using "portupgrade" or "portmaster -w" which preserves old
>
> Untr
Hi Ken,
cc hackers@, re@
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 21:09 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi hackers@,
> > No replies in over 4 days to this, so this is a repost,=20
> > I've also added re@ as newish memstick.img might interest them ?
>
> > (The live command prompt on F4 wasn't much use, no ls
On (23/04/2010 08:10), Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:18:49 +0300
> > From: Gleb Kurtsou
> > To: Lukáš Czerner
> > Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: How to change vnode operations ?
> >
> > On (22/04/2010 16:02), Lu
I was recently given an original Happy Hacking Keyboard. As I sometimes
work in the FreeBSD console, I wanted to have my usual console keymap
adjusted to the new keyboard, but didn't know the scancode for the HHKB
meta key (the diamond key). I couldn't find any program in base or ports
that would s
21 matches
Mail list logo
