In my humble opinion,
With proper -W flags (i.e. -Wall -Werror), the compilation will fail on
"if (var = const)"
also yoda statements of the kind
if (constant == variable)
obfuscate code and make it more difficult to read, definately not a
good idea IMHO, added the confusion between old and ne
> With proper -W flags, "if (var = const)" also yields a warning:
>
> warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
>
> Chaning style(9) in such a fundamental way almost, always isn't a good idea.
> It's simply unrealistic to change all current code to comply and the
> differe
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 21:36:11 Eitan Adler wrote:
> My proposal is simple:
> require that any if statement that compares a constant to a mutable
> variable be written as
> if (constant == variable)
> instead of
> if (variable == constant)
>
> this prevents an extremely common programming error
>
My proposal is simple:
require that any if statement that compares a constant to a mutable variable
be written as
if (constant == variable)
instead of
if (variable == constant)
this prevents an extremely common programming error
if (variable = constant)
While this is almost always found in testin
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:23:41PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 May 2010, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> > I'm proting some application from Linux, which discover its stack bounds
> > by reading and pasing "/proc/self/maps". FreeBSD have
> >"/prov/curproc/map", but I can not find how
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
I'm proting some application from Linux, which discover its stack bounds by
reading and pasing "/proc/self/maps". FreeBSD have "/prov/curproc/map", but
I can not find how to determine which record is for stack (I've looked into
implementation of p
Le Mon, 10 May 2010 08:26:08 -0700,
Sam Leffler a écrit :
Hello,
> > I noticed several things in hifn, if you want to look:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/130286
> >
> > IMHO some locks are missing in the use of sc->sc_sessions (the array
> > containing the sessions) : in hi
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:42:26AM -0700, Evan Geller wrote:
> I'm a bit confused how recursion in the UVA works. vm_map_entries are
> allocated from a vm_map_entry zone, but if the vm_map_entry slabs are
> full and it needs to allocate a vm_map_entry to satisfy the mapping,
> there would seem to b
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:35:00PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> Kostik Belousov yazm??:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 07:48:47PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > > Kostik Belousov yazm??:
> > > > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 09:28:51PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > > > > Kostik Belousov yazm??:
> > > > > > On
Kostik Belousov yazmış:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 07:48:47PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov yazm??:
> > > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 09:28:51PM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > > > Kostik Belousov yazm??:
> > > > > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:33:03AM +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > > > > > Ko
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> I'm not sure, should BSD port behaves as Linux or as
> Solaris one.
Based solely on heritage, I suspect the Solaris approach might
fit more comfortably. Solaris comes from SVR4, which was supposed
to be the great reunification of SysV and BSD, and so has 4.3 BSD
in it
11 matches
Mail list logo
