On 07/16/2010 00:31, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:02:01 -0400
> jhell wrote:
>
>>
>> I should probably note that this is on stable/8 i386 r210115. And that
>> this was before the 210145:210147 commits.
>>
> This is a message from ctfconvert bogusly trying to read non-existent
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:02:01 -0400
jhell wrote:
>
> I should probably note that this is on stable/8 i386 r210115. And that
> this was before the 210145:210147 commits.
>
This is a message from ctfconvert bogusly trying to read non-existent
data from .bss. I have fix for this which I forwarded t
Patrick Mahan wrote:
Just wondering if there is some constraints to using printf() calls
inside a kernel thread (created by kthread_create()). I'm currently
trying to debug a worker thread but the printf's are coming out
garbled. Not entirely sure why this could be occurring.
OS: FreeBSD 7.3
2010/7/15 Alan Cox :
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> On 07/14/10 18:27, Jerry Toung wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Gary Jennejohn
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Rather than commenting out the code try setting the sysctl
>> >> vfs.hirunningspace to vario
I should probably note that this is on stable/8 i386 r210115. And that
this was before the 210145:210147 commits.
Regards,
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubsc
Through 3 recent ``buildkernel'' runs I have logged the following. The
build logs are available to those with interest.
I have tested this with three variations to the environment i.e.
make.conf, src.conf, make -j{N}, & a vanilla build. The errors come up
the same way but with a variation of the
Just wondering if there is some constraints to using printf() calls
inside a kernel thread (created by kthread_create()). I'm currently
trying to debug a worker thread but the printf's are coming out
garbled. Not entirely sure why this could be occurring.
OS: FreeBSD 7.3 on an Intel Xeon with
Em 2010.07.13. 16:05, pluknet escreveu:
#ifndef _SYS_SYSPROTO_H_
struct setjlimit_args {
jid_t jid;
int resource;
struct rlimit *rlp;
};
#endif
int
setjlimit(td, uap)
struct thread *td;
struct setjlimit_args /* {
jid_t jid;
On 07/15/10 04:12, Stanislav Uzunchev wrote:
I have found something very strange to me... It is a problem with static
allocating size of buffer where jail param is going to be coppied, using
jail_getv function from the libjails. Well for example:
buff[size];
jail_getv(0, "name", "1", "host.host
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:36:04PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 15.07.2010 18:32, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > The kernel linker ignores weak attribute of the symbol, as you see.
> > There is more bugs in this department, in regard of the list of
> > exported symbols from the modules.
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 07/14/10 18:27, Jerry Toung wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Gary Jennejohn
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Rather than commenting out the code try setting the sysctl
> >> vfs.hirunningspace to various powers-of-two. Default seems
On 15.07.2010 18:32, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> The kernel linker ignores weak attribute of the symbol, as you see.
> There is more bugs in this department, in regard of the list of
> exported symbols from the modules.
>
> I have a patch that fixes the issues, but I am leery to commit it, since
> th
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:13:54PM +0400, Dmitry Krivenok wrote:
> Unfortunately, one can easily miss such problems during build of the module.
> I'm working on a system which consists of lots of user-space programs
> and kernel modules and
> uses it's own complicated build system.
> gcc option -We
Unfortunately, one can easily miss such problems during build of the module.
I'm working on a system which consists of lots of user-space programs
and kernel modules and
uses it's own complicated build system.
gcc option -Werror is not used by the build system (I believe it
should), that's why we j
2010/7/15 Kostik Belousov :
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:24:53PM +0530, kalash nainwal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:28:53 am kalash nainwal wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
>> >>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:32:35PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 06:07:36PM +0400, Dmitry Krivenok wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
> > I have a question about kernel linker.
> > Please take a look at an example of simple module:
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:24:53PM +0530, kalash nainwal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:28:53 am kalash nainwal wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
> >> I'm not sure what is the api in fre
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:28:53 am kalash nainwal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
>> I'm not sure what is the api in freebsd (something which
>> is similar to __get_free_pages() of linux).
>>
>> W
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:46 PM, "Marc Lörner" wrote:
> Hello,
> what about using contigmalloc(9), there you can specify
> alignment and boundary.
>
> HTH,
> Marc
>
Thanks Marc.
I had thought of using contigmalloc, but was not sure what would be
the other args (boundary, low, high etc.) in my ca
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 06:07:36PM +0400, Dmitry Krivenok wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> I have a question about kernel linker.
> Please take a look at an example of simple module:
>
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
Hello Hackers,
I have a question about kernel linker.
Please take a look at an example of simple module:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
/* DECLARING A FUNCTION JUST TO AVOID WARNIN
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:42:09 am Andrew Heybey wrote:
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:25:29 am Andrew Heybey wrote:
> >> Got the following in /var/log/messages on my one-week-old amd64 box
> >> running 8.1RC2:
> >>
> >> Jul 13 20:30:17
On 07/14/10 18:27, Jerry Toung wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Gary Jennejohn
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Rather than commenting out the code try setting the sysctl
>> vfs.hirunningspace to various powers-of-two. Default seems to be
>> 1MB. I just changed it on the command line as a test to 2
On Jul 15, 2010, at 8:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:25:29 am Andrew Heybey wrote:
>> Got the following in /var/log/messages on my one-week-old amd64 box running
>> 8.1RC2:
>>
>> Jul 13 20:30:17 spaten kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0106, Status
>> 0x
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 6:28:53 am kalash nainwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
> I'm not sure what is the api in freebsd (something which
> is similar to __get_free_pages() of linux).
>
> Would malloc(4096, ...) guarantee that the returned
> address
On Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:25:29 am Andrew Heybey wrote:
> Got the following in /var/log/messages on my one-week-old amd64 box running
> 8.1RC2:
>
> Jul 13 20:30:17 spaten kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0106, Status
> 0x
> Jul 13 20:30:17 spaten kernel: MCA: Vendor "Au
on 15/07/2010 14:39 Kostik Belousov said the following:
>
> Is new behaviour completely identical to the behaviour of the newer
> ld ?
No, it's not completely identical.
__start_SECNAME placement would be identical, but our ld would still assign the
symbol while latest upstream binutils PROVIDES
Hello,
what about using contigmalloc(9), there you can specify
alignment and boundary.
HTH,
Marc
>Hi,
>
>I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
>I'm not sure what is the api in freebsd (something which
>is similar to __get_free_pages() of linux).
>
>Would malloc(4096, ...) guara
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:25:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 11/07/2010 15:23 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 11/07/2010 14:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >> For completeness, here is a patch that simply drops the inline assembly
> >> and the
> >> comment about it, and GCC-gen
on 11/07/2010 15:23 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 11/07/2010 14:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> For completeness, here is a patch that simply drops the inline assembly and
>> the
>> comment about it, and GCC-generated assembly and its diff:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/dpcpu/pc
Hi,
I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
I'm not sure what is the api in freebsd (something which
is similar to __get_free_pages() of linux).
Would malloc(4096, ...) guarantee that the returned
address is aligned on page boundary?
Thanks and regards,
-Kalash
__
Hi,
I want to allocate one (or more) pages in kernel space.
I'm not sure what is the api in freebsd (something which
is similar to __get_free_pages() of linux).
Would malloc(4096, ...) guarantee that the returned
address is aligned on page boundary?
Thanks and regards,
-Kalash
__
Hi, all.
I have found something very strange to me... It is a problem with static
allocating size of buffer where jail param is going to be coppied, using
jail_getv function from the libjails. Well for example:
buff[size];
jail_getv(0, "name", "1", "host.hostname", buff, NULL);
the result for si
33 matches
Mail list logo
