2010/8/7 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Perhaps. I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
the list archives (other than me announcing the
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:57:44AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
In order to help users having 4k sector drives which the system
recognizes as 512 byte sector drives, I'm proposing a patch to glabel
which enables it to use a forced sector size for its native-labeled
providers. It is
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
So why do you want to obfuscate glabel with it? For people to start
depend on it? Once we start supporting 4kB sectors what do we do with
such a change? Remove it and decrease version
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no writes:
Perhaps. ??I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
the list archives (other
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'd like to hear comments from the wider audience. In respect with your
comment, I will compromise: as 4k sector drives have become available
over the counter
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:57:44AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
In order to help users having 4k sector drives which the system
recognizes as 512 byte sector drives, I'm proposing
2010/8/4 m...@freebsd.org:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 10:08:22 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:39:02 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
We've seen a few instances at work where witness_warn() in ast()
indicates
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2010/8/4 m...@freebsd.org:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 10:08:22 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:39:02 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
In message: 20100808130624.gb40...@sandvine.com
Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
:
: 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no:
: Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no writes:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 21:08, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8.8.2010 14:57, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This mechanism is a band-aid until there's a better way of dealing
with 4k drives.
I do not like this at all. Even
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, M. Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
In message: 20100808130624.gb40...@sandvine.com
Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
:
: 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no:
: Garrett
I have a similar problem.
I have a NFS server (8.0 upgraded a couple times since Feb 2010) that
locks up
and requires a reboot.
The clients are busy vm's from VMWare ESXi using the NFS server for
vmdk virtual
disk storage.
The ESXi reports nfs server inactive and all the vm's post
12 matches
Mail list logo
