Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 11.08.2010 10:04, Valentin Nechayev wrote: example, set up geometry xxx*64*32 for all new disks and align GPT partitions on 1MB boundary. As soon as FS requests in FreeBSD are no less than 4KB in size, this would satisfy any disk. If 4KB sectors are our future for a few next years, this

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com writes: After poking around some, it seems ATA/ATAPI-7 Identify Device word 106 bit 13 is set to 1 and bits 0-3 are set to 3 (for 2^3 or 8 LBAs per sector) for a 4KB sector size (pin 7-8 jumper on a WD AF disks presumably changes this setting to 0,0). See page

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Matthew Jacob m...@feral.com writes: Yes, that should be it! No, it shouldn't, cf. extensive discussion about EARS disks on -current. They lie about their physical sector size. There's a jumper setting for Windows XP compatibility, but apparently, it only affects the (fake) geometry the disk

8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check

2010-08-11 Thread Dan Langille
I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D This morning I found this in my /var/log/messages: Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x94614c62001c011b Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Valentin Nechayev
I'm looking into a clean, permanent solution for WD Green drives that use 4096-byte physical sectors. To summarize the information I've collected so far: There is attempt to look from another side - is it really needed? Captain Obvious says that if one have a new disk, it's easy to format it

Re: 8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check

2010-08-11 Thread Andrew Heybey
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Dan Langille wrote: I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D This morning I found this in my /var/log/messages: Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Bank

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Valentin Nechayev
des@ wrote: There's a jumper setting for Windows XP compatibility, but apparently, it only affects the (fake) geometry the disk reports to the BIOS. No, this jumper internally increases any linear block number learned from bus request by 1. I.e. the block number 1 without this jumper is seen

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:04:39AM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: I'm looking into a clean, permanent solution for WD Green drives that use 4096-byte physical sectors. To summarize the information I've collected so far: There is attempt to look from another side - is it really needed?

Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks

2010-08-11 Thread Olivier Smedts
2010/8/11, Valentin Nechayev ne...@netch.kiev.ua: I'm looking into a clean, permanent solution for WD Green drives that use 4096-byte physical sectors. To summarize the information I've collected so far: There is attempt to look from another side - is it really needed? Captain Obvious says

Re: 8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check

2010-08-11 Thread Dan Langille
On Wed, August 11, 2010 7:31 am, Andrew Heybey wrote: On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Dan Langille wrote: I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D This morning I found this in my

Re: 8.1-STABLE amd64 machine check

2010-08-11 Thread John Baldwin
Dan Langille wrote: I am encountering a situation similar to one reported by Andrew Heybey at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6E83197B-9DD5-4C7E-846D-AD176C25464D This morning I found this in my /var/log/messages: Aug 11 01:59:48 kraken kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x94614c62001c011b Aug

Re: real memory falsely reports 8G, BIOS avail memory reports 1G

2010-08-11 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Ref. http://berklix.com/~jhs/hardware/laptops/novatech-8355/ I wrote A laptop here emits a puzzlingly dmesg to both 8.1-RC2 8.1-RELEASE: real memory = 8572108800 (8175 MB) avail memory = 1018789888 (971 MB) BIOS reckons it has 1G. No panel to unscrew to inspect memory. I