Quoting Paul B Mahol (from Mon, 4 Oct 2010 11:01:45 +):
On 10/4/10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Paul B Mahol (from Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:53:26
+):
Hi,
diff --git a/tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
b/tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
index d3aa4b2..2123107 10064
Quoting Gonzalo Nemmi (from Tue, 5 Oct 2010
01:30:00 +0200):
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 10/4/10, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:01:45AM +, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 10/4/10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> At least status-mailq is still use
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Svatopluk Kraus
>> > wrote:
>> >> Beyond 'kernel_map', some submaps of 'kernel_map' (buffer_map,
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Leidinger
To: Gonzalo Nemmi
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:34:23 +0200
Subject: Re: Improve OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
> Quoting Gonzalo Nemmi (from Tue, 5 Oct 2010
> 01:30:00 +0200):
>
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM,
Hello hackers,
I got reminded of a problem I had a couple of years back compressing FreeBSD
jails. I was using bsdiff for the compression and found out that md5 sums of
static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib didn't match between
jails, even though the source code used to cre
Quoting rank1see...@gmail.com (from Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:48:23 +0200):
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Leidinger
To: Gonzalo Nemmi
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:34:23 +0200
Subject: Re: Improve OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc
As the one who wrote the functi
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I got reminded of a problem I had a couple of years back compressing
> FreeBSD jails. I was using bsdiff for the compression and found out
> that md5 sums of static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and
> /usr/l
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> I'm wondering if this is necessary, or if this can possibly be turned
> of with a knob somewhere.
Newer binutils got a flag after a discussion about this and related
issues in NetBSD. It basically stores 0 for the uid/gid/time fie
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
I'm wondering if this is necessary, or if this can possibly be turned
of with a knob somewhere.
Newer binutils got a flag after a discussion about this and related
issues in NetBSD.
on 30/09/2010 20:17 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> Here's a patch that adds a sysctl for querying kmem_map->size, which may be
> useful
> for system state/resources monitoring:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/sysctl-kmem_map_size.diff
>
> I am quite unsure about sizeof(kmem_map->size) ==
Hi Kib,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:44:57PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Hardcoding /usr/lib as the path to the library in the script looks
> problematic. For the buidlworld, you are linking resulting binaries
> with the host library, instead of the buildworld-produced one. For
> lib32, it make
In kern_switch.c,
It is said that, Free threads are 'preassigned' to the KSEs. and that the
KSEs derive their priority from threads and are put on the run queue.
1. Where do the threads receive their priorities from?
2. Does it recieve the priority from the KSEG?
--
Eknath Venkataramani
Den 05/10/2010 kl. 15.59 skrev Erik Trulsson:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> Hello hackers,
>>
>> I got reminded of a problem I had a couple of years back compressing
>> FreeBSD jails. I was using bsdiff for the compression and found out
>> that md5 sums
Hi all,
based on a work of rwatson@ about micro-benchmarking,
I managed to have a kernel module that exposes some sysctls.
Reading sysctl associated to test start the benchmark and print the results.
The code is split up in this way:
test.h, test.c
where the infrastructure work lives.
test_sync_t
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
We do not have a target which allows to go to src/bin/XXX and run "make
deinstall" or similar. What is correctly written in this thread is that "make
check-old" and "make delete-old" (and "make delete-old-libs") is supposed to
do what you want (g
On 10/5/10 2:19 PM, Eknath Venkataramani wrote:
In kern_switch.c,
It is said that, Free threads are 'preassigned' to the KSEs. and that the
KSEs derive their priority from threads and are put on the run queue.
1. Where do the threads receive their priorities from?
from the process they are ass
hi there,
i think the following example shows the problem better than a long explanation:
`touch ftest && chflags arch ftest && chflags -vv 0 ftest`.
^^non-root ^^root^^non-root
chflags claims to have cleared the 'arch' flag (which should be impossible as
non-root user), but
On 5 October 2010 11:19, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> Is there a functional difference between the original file and
> bsd.crunchgen.mk ?
Only the bare minimum needed to make it useful:
* added shared library as well as fully static library support
* added a method for listing source
On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 05/10/2010 kl. 15.59 skrev Erik Trulsson:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>>>
>>> I was using bsdiff for the compression and found out
>>> that md5 sums of static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and
>>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
