Re: Interactive tool for installing packages

2010-11-10 Thread perryh
Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > in order to install the program, you need to: > > # git clone git://git.unix-heaven.org/public/pkg_add_it ... > Surely, there's room for improvement, but that's a start.. :) Dunno about anyone else, but from my standpoint it would be a _big_ improvement to provide

Re: [PATCH] Simplify uart_bus_pci_probe

2010-11-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>    Some of the logic could have been simplified in the probe. The >> proposed patch makes the detection process a tad bit more >> straightforward. >>    Comments, review (and maybe

Re: Interactive tool for installing packages

2010-11-10 Thread Marin Atanasov Nikolov
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:01 AM, wrote: > Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > >> in order to install the program, you need to: >> >> # git clone git://git.unix-heaven.org/public/pkg_add_it > ... >> Surely, there's room for improvement, but that's a start.. :) > > Dunno about anyone else, but from m

kern.smp.topology

2010-11-10 Thread Ivan Klymenko
Hello! People. Who can explain the purpose of sysctl variable kern.smp.topology? What does it affect? It may take such values: 1 -Dual core with no sharing. 2 -No topology, all cpus are equal. 3 -Dual core with shared L2. 4 -quad core, shared l3 among each package, private l2.

Re: kern.smp.topology

2010-11-10 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/10/10 11:56, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > Hello! People. > > Who can explain the purpose of sysctl variable kern.smp.topology? > What does it affect? > > It may take such values: > 1 -Dual core with no sharing. > 2 -No topology, all cpus are equal. > 3 -Dual core with shared L2. >

Re: kern.smp.topology

2010-11-10 Thread Ivan Klymenko
В Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:20:45 +0100 Ivan Voras пишет: > On 11/10/10 11:56, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > Hello! People. > > > > Who can explain the purpose of sysctl variable kern.smp.topology? > > What does it affect? > > > > It may take such values: > > 1 -Dual core with no sharing. > > 2

Re: [PATCH] Simplify uart_bus_pci_probe

2010-11-10 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >> On Nov 6, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>>Some of the logic could have been simplified in the probe. The >>> proposed patch makes the detection process a tad

Re: Interactive tool for installing packages

2010-11-10 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Nov 10), per...@pluto.rain.com said: > Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > > in order to install the program, you need to: > > > > # git clone git://git.unix-heaven.org/public/pkg_add_it > ... > > Surely, there's room for improvement, but that's a start.. :) > > Dunno about anyon

libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels?

2010-11-10 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hi, I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd is not ALIVE. The only consumer in our tree that I can make out is *probably* kgd

Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels?

2010-11-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2010-11-10 21:41, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: But, the kgdb file gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/kvm-fbsd.c, where kvm_getprocs is probably called on a dead kernel is not even used during build! So I guess I'm staring at dead code here, any kvm people around that can clue me in? In gnu/usr.bin/binutils

Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels?

2010-11-10 Thread Julian Elischer
On 11/10/10 12:41 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Hi, I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd is not ALIVE. The only consumer in

Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels?

2010-11-10 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:41:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > I have this cleanup of libkvm sitting in my tree and it needs a little > bit of testing, especially the function kvm_proclist, which is only > called from kvm_deadprocs which is only called from kvm_getprocs when kd > is not ALIVE.

python + build ports = failure (threading problem)

2010-11-10 Thread David Naylor
Hi, I've found a problem in FreeBSD's implementation for threads, pth does not have this problem. The following test case consistantly reproduces the problem: --- start --- #! /usr/bin/env python from subprocess import Popen, PIPE from threading import Lock, Thread def runner(): process =

Re: Interactive tool for installing packages

2010-11-10 Thread perryh
Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > If you do not have git installed, you could still get the > latest snapshot of pkg_add_it via the Cgit repo. [1] > [1] http://git.unix-heaven.org/cgit.cgi/pkg_add_it/ Aha! I'm sure I looked at that page before posting, but did not see how to pull down a snapshot

Re: Interactive tool for installing packages

2010-11-10 Thread Marin Atanasov Nikolov
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:01 AM, wrote: > Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote: > >> If you do not have git installed, you could still get the >> latest snapshot of pkg_add_it via the Cgit repo. [1] >> [1] http://git.unix-heaven.org/cgit.cgi/pkg_add_it/ > > Aha!  I'm sure I looked at that page before po