Among four machines on my network, I'm observing startling differences
in NFS performance. All machines are AMD64, and rpc_statd, rpc_lockd,
and amd are enabled on all four machines.
wonderland:
hw.model: AMD Athlon(tm) II Dual-Core M32
hw.physmem: 293510758
ethernet: 100Mb/s
partition 1:
George
I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE,
a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have
you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount
options ?
On 1/8/11, george+free...@m5p.com george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
Among four
George
I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE,
a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have
you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount
options ?
I'll update to 8.2-RC1 later today and see if anything changes, but
FYI, -stable is probably the better list for this.
On 01/08/2011 09:54, george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
George
I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE,
a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have
you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are
FYI, -stable is probably the better list for this.
On 01/08/2011 09:54, george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
George
I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE,
a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have
you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also
:On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 02:24:34PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Does anyone know if an IRET cancels/triggers a MONITOR event?
:
:AMD's Architecture Programmer's Manual explicitly contains:
:
:Events that cause an exit from the monitor event pending state include:
:...
:- Any far control
George
I remember reading there was some sort of nfs issues in 8.1-RELEASE,
a regression of some sort it was noted early on in the release. Have
you tried this with 8.2-RC1 also what are your nfs client mount
options ?
On 1/8/11, george+free...@m5p.com george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
Among
On Thu Jan 6 11, Warner Losh wrote:
On 01/06/2011 06:45, Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Jan 6 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 6 January 2011 04:40, Alexander Bestarun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
while building target buildkernel with 'clang -v' i noticed a lot of
these
lines:
On 01/08/2011 10:19, george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
No, I did not report the problems then.-- George
Well we're glad you're reporting them now. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth
Rick
Do you have more details on the issue is it 8.x only ? Can you point
us to the stable thread abourt this ?
On 1/8/11, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/08/2011 10:19, george+free...@m5p.com wrote:
No, I did not report the problems then.-- George
Well
Hi,
Today I ran into an issue where setting the default slice with boot0cfg
-s is broken.
This is related to a section of this revision:
+ commit Warner's patch orb $NOUPDATE,_FLAGS(%bp)
to avoid writing to disk in case of a timeout/default choice;
This issue is quite well documented in
11 matches
Mail list logo
