Hi Daniel,
I'm afraid many people subscribed to stable are also hanging here and you may
not have much more luck.
If that is the case, you may wanna try freebsd-fs@
You will also want to:
- increase geom's verbosity
- provide your uname -a + zfs version
- run dmesg -a for any additional info
On Fri Feb 4 11, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Alexander, good day.
hi eygene. thanks a lot for your patch. i made two changes:
1) also catch the -v option for install(1).
2) install(1) accepts multiple directories as arguments, when he -d flag has
been specified. so i don't think it's necessary
Alexander, good day.
Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:22:21AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi eygene. thanks a lot for your patch.
You're welcome ;))
> i made two changes:
>
> 1) also catch the -v option for install(1).
Yep.
> 2) install(1) accepts multiple directories as arguments, when he -d flag
On Fri Feb 4 11, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Alexander, good day.
>
> Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:22:21AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi eygene. thanks a lot for your patch.
>
> You're welcome ;))
>
> > i made two changes:
> >
> > 1) also catch the -v option for install(1).
>
> Yep.
>
> > 2)
On 04/02/2011 03:56, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I hooked up a logic analyser and I can see most of the time it's fairly
regularly transferring 16k of data every 2msec.
If I load up the disk by, eg, tar -cf /dev/null /local0 I find it drops out and
I can see gaps in the transfers until eventually
On 04/02/2011, at 21:48, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> I am wondering if this is a scheduler problem (or I am expecting too much :)
>> in that it is not running my libusb thread reliably under load. The other
>> possibility is that it is a USB issue, although I am looking at using
>> isochronous transfe
On behalf of the 3rd Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems
(HotStorage '11) program committee, I would like to invite you to submit
papers that present a fresh look at file and storage technologies.
Storage systems continue to present important research challenges and
opportunities t
On 04/02/2011 12:45, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 04/02/2011, at 21:48, Ivan Voras wrote:
I am wondering if this is a scheduler problem (or I am expecting too much :) in
that it is not running my libusb thread reliably under load. The other
possibility is that it is a USB issue, although I am lo
On 05/02/2011, at 11:09, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> It doesn't allocate memory once it's going, everything is preallocated
>> before the data transfer starts.
>>
>> I'll have a go with mlock() and see what happens.
>
> Did you find anything interesting?
I'll be looking at it on Monday, I will let yo
9 matches
Mail list logo
