On 04/02/2011, at 13:26, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I only have about 10 milliseconds of buffering (96kbyte FIFO, 8Mbyte/sec) in
the hardware, however I have about 128Mb of USB requests queued up to libusb.
hps@ informed me that libusb will only queue 16kbyte (2msec) in the kernel at
one time
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:50:06AM +0100, Mats Lindberg wrote:
All,
I have been using a small program /rt) that utilize the sched_setscheduler()
syscall to set the scheduling policy of a process to SCHED_RR. Been running
it FBSD 5.x and 6.x. Now when migrating to FBSD 8.1 I get EPERM back at
On 17 February 2011 12:50, Mats Lindberg mats.w.lindb...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have been using a small program /rt) that utilize the sched_setscheduler()
syscall to set the scheduling policy of a process to SCHED_RR. Been running
it FBSD 5.x and 6.x. Now when migrating to FBSD 8.1 I get
On 18 February 2011 14:13, venom samflan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/11/2011 11:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2011 7:48:39 am venom wrote:
Hello.
i am trying build mcelog
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jan 14
04:15:56
UTC 2011
First, do you have a console output during the run ? Is it possible
that machine paniced ? If not, were there any kernel messages before
reboot ?
Second, what is the process you are dumping ? Can you show at least
the procstat -v pid output for the process ?
Sorry for this late
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 03:58:05AM -0800, Dr. Baud wrote:
First, do you have a console output during the run ? Is it possible
that machine paniced ? If not, were there any kernel messages before
reboot ?
Second, what is the process you are dumping ? Can you show at least
the
Sergey,
thanks for your comment - however it was my own mistake
in rt.c ...
static void setSchedPolicy( int policy )
{
struct sched_param schedParam = { 0 };
TRY(sched_getparam(0, schedParam),-1);
switch ( policy )
{
case SCHED_RR:
case SCHED_FIFO:
Hi,
I try to figure out locking strategy in FreeBSD and found 'ichsmb'
device. There is a mutex which protects smb bus (ichsmb device). For
example in ichsmb_readw() in sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c, the mutex is
locked and a command is written to bus, then unbounded (but with
timeout) sleep is done
Hi,
I deal with devices (i2c bus, flash memory), which are quite slow,
i.e. some or mostly all operations on it are quite slow. One must wait
for it for rather long time. Use of DELAY() is too expensive and an
inactive (so called unbound) wait isn't permited with mutexes. So, no
priority
On Friday 18 February 2011 15:10:47 Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
Hi,
I try to figure out locking strategy in FreeBSD and found 'ichsmb'
device. There is a mutex which protects smb bus (ichsmb device). For
example in ichsmb_readw() in sys/dev/ichsmb/ichsmb.c, the mutex is
locked and a command is
I have finally got back to this and did the style and vm_map_remove()
return value handling fixes, updated the patches in-place:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-dvb.patch
(for head)
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-dvb-8.patch
(for 8.)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at
11 matches
Mail list logo