The new flag is '0x0f' but it should be '0x40' since that's a bit field...
I did some doodling with this as well in my tree, and came up with something
similar. I had an ifdef that forced the new mode, but I was never happy with
the results.
Warner
On Mar 24, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Alexander Best
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:21:15 +
Alexander Best wrote:
> i hacked up humanized_number(3) a bit in order to produce the
> following df(1) output:
> [...]
> 4.2Gi 4.2Gi 0B 100% 0 0 100% /media/dvd
I don't know if it's correct, but Snow Leopard uses "Bi" for bytes.
--
Bruc
here is a revised patch. it also includes the necessary changes to the
humanize_number(3) man page.
cheers.
alex
--
a13x
diff --git a/lib/libutil/humanize_number.3 b/lib/libutil/humanize_number.3
index 82925ba..841da3f 100644
--- a/lib/libutil/humanize_number.3
+++ b/lib/libutil/humanize_number.
here's a rough draft. it introduces a new flag called HN_IEC_PREFIXES so
nothing should get broken and each utility can decide for itself whether to use
the SI binary, SI decimal or the IEC certified prefixes.
another possibility would be to #ifdef the extra code. this would offer the
possibility
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Johan van Selst wrote:
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> 2. nvi does not use iconv, nvi-m17n only supports limited non-Unicode
>> mbyte encodings, nvi-devel has too many problems. So we don't have a
>> nvi which comes with fully mbyte enconding support;
>
> Could you please
hi there,
i hacked up humanized_number(3) a bit in order to produce the following df(1)
output:
otaku% df -hi; df -Hi
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/ada0p3 217Gi 430Mi 200Gi 0%6.2k 29M0% /
devfs1.0Ki 1.0Ki
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> 2. nvi does not use iconv, nvi-m17n only supports limited non-Unicode
> mbyte encodings, nvi-devel has too many problems. So we don't have a
> nvi which comes with fully mbyte enconding support;
Could you please eleborate on the nvi-devel problems? I'm the current
maintainer o
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
>> ed seems works, but it's not either vi or ex.
>> I'm not typically like ee... I sill wondering why we kept it in base
>> system. It does not work when termcap is not correct, so I still need
>> to use ed in such a
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> ed seems works, but it's not either vi or ex.
> I'm not typically like ee... I sill wondering why we kept it in base
> system. It does not work when termcap is not correct, so I still need
> to use ed in such a case. Same thing happens to ex-vi.
History:
ee was added long
Hello.
My name is Dudinskyi Oleksandr. I am a student of National aviation university,
Ukraine. I want to participate in GSoC 2011 with your organization.
My project: Disk device error counters, iostat –e.
I thing this project is very necessary in the FreeBSD system. Now I make a
plan to dev
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:49:24AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >
>
> Let clean up the my points:
> 1. ex-vi is POSIX vi compatible, and it supports mbyte encodings. But
> there are lots of work need to be done if we want to use it to replace
At work we cross-compile several kld modules. They just upgraded to
gcc 4.5, but gdb 6.X is not compatible with the debug symbols produced
by gcc 4.5. Has anybody ever tried merging kgdb into a newer gdb
version? Anybody have patches that they can share?
_
Hi,
Thanks for your replay. That is just my self-introduction:) I want
to borrow the shared memory idea from KVM, I am not want to port a
whole KVM:) But for this project, there are some basic problems.
As I know, tsc counter is CPU specific. If the process running on
a multi-core platfor
On 24/03/2011 14:11, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Well, it depends on the decision of core team. AFAIC, to make the KVM
to be committed is very hard, especially for a GSoC project.
Ah, please read what I'm saying: finish, not commit.
But... I think the thread is not talking about the KVM itself...
FU
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24/03/2011 12:21, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/03/2011 10:00, Jing Huang wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am a student of Peking University in China. I am interes
On 24/03/2011 12:21, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24/03/2011 10:00, Jing Huang wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am a student of Peking University in China. I am interest
in the FreeBSD project of "Timecounter Performance Improvements".
I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:20:07PM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> >> Among *all* the GNU/Linux distributions I use
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 24/03/2011 10:00, Jing Huang wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I am a student of Peking University in China. I am interest
>> in the FreeBSD project of "Timecounter Performance Improvements".
>>
>> I am familiar with Linux ker
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:20:07PM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> >> Among *all* the GNU/Linux distributions I used, they include a vim
> >> compiled in tiny mode (ln -s it to
On 24/03/2011 10:00, Jing Huang wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am a student of Peking University in China. I am interest
in the FreeBSD project of "Timecounter Performance Improvements".
I am familiar with Linux kernel and virtualization systems,
like KVM and Xen. I have maintained t
Pan Tsu wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
>
> [...]
> > To be honest, I don't think that loader takes so much time.
> > When you set autoboot_delay="-1" and beastie_disable="YES",
> > the time spent in loader is negligible. (I'm assuming that
> > you also set BOOTWAIT=0 in make.conf, so boo
Hi Everyone,
I am a student of Peking University in China. I am interest
in the FreeBSD project of "Timecounter Performance Improvements".
I am familiar with Linux kernel and virtualization systems,
like KVM and Xen. I have maintained the Linux Server for my College
for last who
Oliver Fromme writes:
[...]
> To be honest, I don't think that loader takes so much time.
> When you set autoboot_delay="-1" and beastie_disable="YES",
> the time spent in loader is negligible. (I'm assuming that
> you also set BOOTWAIT=0 in make.conf, so boot2 doesn't wait
> for a keypress eith
23 matches
Mail list logo
