Hi,
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
--
Regards,
Jo Galara
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
0n Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:31:27AM +0200, Jo Galara wrote:
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
subscribe to: http://www.freshports.org/
-Alex
IMPORTANT: This
On 30/03/2011 06:31, Jo Galara wrote:
Hi,
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
Hi,
I use ports rather than packages, so a combination of a cron for
portsnap to update the portstree
Quoting husaini harun husaini.insan...@gmail.com (from Tue, 29 Mar
2011 08:45:59 +):
example I would like to join existing projects, will have to submit proposal
too ?
Yes. This is because we want to see if you have a more or less good
idea what you can do during the GSoC and if you
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:32PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:31:27AM +0200, Jo Galara wrote:
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
Quoting husaini harun husaini.insan...@gmail.com (from Tue, 29 Mar
2011 09:20:51 +):
I am interested to participate Document all sysctls - gsoc 2011
could provide specific to this project, such as how to start a project, in
addition, I was FreeBSD 8.2, ZFS users, I have yet to send
Quoting Jo Galara jogal...@gmail.com (from Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:31:27 +0200):
Hi,
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
If you have portupgrade installed you can change
/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:31:27AM +0200, Jo Galara typed:
Hi,
on Debian I'm using apticron which sends me an email if there are
updates available for installed packages. Is there a similar program for
FreeBSD?
--
Regards,
Jo Galara
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:20:30 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I thought I knew something about how the compiler looks for include
files, but now I think maybe I don't know much. :-)
So here's what I'm pondering. When I build a library, like e.g. libc,
where do the include files get pulled
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:20:30 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I thought I knew something about how the compiler looks for include
files, but now I think maybe I don't know much. :-)
So here's what I'm pondering. When
On 2011-03-29 23:20, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
So here's what I'm pondering. When I build a library, like e.g. libc,
where do the include files get pulled from? They can't (shouldn't) be
the ones in /usr/include, but I don't see a -nostdinc like for the
kernel. There are -I directives in the
On 03/30/11 10:23, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-03-29 23:20, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
So here's what I'm pondering. When I build a library, like e.g. libc,
where do the include files get pulled from? They can't (shouldn't) be
the ones in /usr/include, but I don't see a -nostdinc like for the
On 2011-03-30 17:26, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
...
During the bootstrap stage, a copy of gcc (or clang) is built, that has
all default search paths for headers, libraries, etc, set relative to
${WORLDTMP}, usually /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp.
...
Since you need to build two compilers anyway (one for
Hello.
Sorry I did not write all the details of the project immediately. I'll try
to explain my project.
The present system has no utility statistic errors for disk devices that is
not convenient for analyzing faults disk as a result unstable operation of
programs. I propose to develop a system
On Mar 30, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
This is a rather nasty hack, though. If we can make it work, we should
probably try using --sysroot instead, or alternatively, -nostdinc and
adding include dirs by hand. The same for executable and library search
paths, although I am not
I'm not particular at the moment, but with the proliferation of IPMI in
the server environment, is there any consideration to putting one of the
appropriately licensed tools into the base?
Sean
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
I don't think that this is a good idea for a number of reasons. IPMI is
not nearly as prevalent as one might think it is, it is not a true
standard (Intel only), and there are a variety of good toolsets that are
very easy to install. Finally, users of IPMI are sophisticated enough to
install
17 matches
Mail list logo
