Hi fellow hackers,
I'd like to share some work that I've been slaving over for the past 7 days.
I've converted tzsetup(8) from a C program that relies on dialog(3) into an
sh(1) script that relies on either dialog(1) or Xdialog(1).
http://druidbsd.sourceforge.net/download/tzdialog.txt
or
http
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:45:12PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/3/11 7:35 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >__linux__ is exactly what __FreeBSD__ is and dies not identify kernel
> >but rather Linux as whole OS, whatever that might be these days.
> >
> >There does not appear to be an universal
On 7/3/11 1:16 AM, grarpamp wrote:
Would be nice to be able to set different times in different jails.
All jails would tick in step with the system.
But each jail could have it's birthtime set specifically via jail(8),
jail(2), etc. Either by specification of a specific time, or an offset
from th
This patch fixes a (harmless) warning when is parsed by
upstream version of GCC.
--
Robert Millan
Index: sys/sys/cdefs.h
===
--- sys/sys/cdefs.h (revision 223736)
+++ sys/sys/cdefs.h (working copy)
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
#endi
"deeptec...@gmail.com" writes:
> moving [
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/231301.html
> ] to the freebsd-hackers list, as there doesn't seem to be enough 1337
> people in the freebsd-questions list. :<
You might want to try rewording your question, because it di
moving [
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/231301.html
] to the freebsd-hackers list, as there doesn't seem to be enough 1337
people in the freebsd-questions list. :<
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 05:47:02PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> isn't it enough if support is present in the FreeBSD
> version of these compilers (for production and development releases of
> FreeBSD), plus the latest release of the upstream version of each of
> those compilers?
You may find the
Would be nice to be able to set different times in different jails.
All jails would tick in step with the system.
But each jail could have it's birthtime set specifically via jail(8),
jail(2), etc. Either by specification of a specific time, or an offset
from the current true system time. ie:
jail
Hi Hackers,
Why does these function allow seeking beyond the EOF of a file in
O_RDONLY/²rb² mode ?
How does these function then signal the EOF correctly ?
Seeking beyond the EOF makes sense for me in write-mode but not in read-only
mode !
With Regards,
Martin
Hi! I am taking a FreeBSD course this summer and I'm doing a homework. A new
system call uidkill() is to be added. uidkill(uid_t uid, int signum) sends
signal specified by signum to all processes owned by uid, excluding the
calling process itself.
I'm almost done, however I get stuck with priv_ch
10 matches
Mail list logo