Re: cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Brandon Falk
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:47:03PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:09:40PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:48:02PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I was

reducing compiler instances during buildkernel

2011-11-05 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, when doing buildkernel one notices that the gcc or clang instances are spawned and closed so fast that top isn't fast enough to show them and the "last pid" field increases quite fast. obviously this produces quite a lot of syscall overhead. wouldn't it be possible to somehow spawn N gc

Re: FreeBSD on ARM Cortex board [Was: Porting FreeBSD to Raspberry Pi]

2011-11-05 Thread Ben Gray
On 04/11/2011 02:51, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, [Starting a new thread, added Ben Gray to the Cc: list] On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Nate Dobbs wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Thursday, 3 N

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:45:53 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: KB> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: >> >> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: >> >> >> KB> I think that the aux vector must be naturally aligned. You can >> return >> >> KB>

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: > > >> KB> I think that the aux vector must be naturally aligned. You can return > >> KB> ENOEXEC early if vptr is not aligned. > >> > >> Not sure I see what you mean

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: >> KB> I think that the aux vector must be naturally aligned. You can return >> KB> ENOEXEC early if vptr is not aligned. >> >> Not sure I see what you mean. vptr for auxv is calculated just couple lines >> above, and I check the re

Re: cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:09:40PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:48:02PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is > > > fine.

Re: cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Fabian Keil
Brandon Falk wrote: > I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is > fine. But then cdparanoia starting to no longer respond. Now it's > zombied and sitting in cbwait. `kill -9 ` does not take it down, it > seems like it's stuck in the kernel (?). Is this an issue to look

Re: cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > Hello, > > I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is > fine. But then cdparanoia starting to no longer respond. Now it's > zombied and sitting in cbwait. `kill -9 ` does not take it down, it > seems like it'

Re: cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Brandon Falk
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:48:02PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 12:42:12PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is > > fine. But then cdparanoia starting to no longer respond. Now it's > > zombied a

cdparanoia stuck in cbwait

2011-11-05 Thread Brandon Falk
Hello, I was got some read errors when I was reading from my disk, which is fine. But then cdparanoia starting to no longer respond. Now it's zombied and sitting in cbwait. `kill -9 ` does not take it down, it seems like it's stuck in the kernel (?). Is this an issue to look at cdparanoia for, or

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: > > KB> +if (error == EFAULT) { > KB> +for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > KB> +c = fubyte(sptr + i); > KB> +

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: KB> +if (error == EFAULT) { KB> +for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { KB> +c = fubyte(sptr + i); KB> +if (c < 0) KB> As a purely stylistical issue, compare with -1. KB> +

Re: BUG: 'glabel label' name's lenght, is truncated without err/warn

2011-11-05 Thread Lucas Holt
On Nov 5, 2011, at 7:02 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote: > 8.2R p4 both i386/amd64 > > > Supplied name of 16 chars > -- > # glabel label -v swap_679592d048a ada0s3b > Metadata value stored on ada0s3b. > Done. > -- > > Truncated to 15 chars > -- > # ll /dev/label > total 0 > crw-r- 1 root

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:27:37PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: > > KB> I think it is better to use sys/elf.h over the machine/elf.h. > > KB> Please change the comment for PROC_AUXV_MAX to "Safety limit on > KB> auxv size". Also, it wo

BUG: 'glabel label' name's lenght, is truncated without err/warn

2011-11-05 Thread rank1seeker
8.2R p4 both i386/amd64 Supplied name of 16 chars -- # glabel label -v swap_679592d048a ada0s3b Metadata value stored on ada0s3b. Done. -- Truncated to 15 chars -- # ll /dev/label total 0 crw-r- 1 root operator - 0, 133 Nov 5 11:41:54 2011 swap_679592d048 -- Domagoj Smolčić _

Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)

2011-11-05 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote: KB> I suspect this is my bug: Reading the GET_PS_STRINGS_CHUNK_SZ may validly KB> return EFAULT if the string is shorter than the chunk and aligned at KB> the end of the page, assuming the next page is not mapped. There should KB> be a