On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:23:22PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
I need to draw graph of dummynet's CPU usage.
procstat -t 0 shows me TID (thread id) of dummynet kernel thread.
ps -Hxo time,lwp shows me total CPU time consumed by this thread.
Now I see this time has 9 seconds increase
On Mon Nov 21 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
here's a revised patch.
...
+.Sh CAVEATS
+If the
+.Fn lseek
+system call is operating on a device, which is incapable of seeking,
+it will request the
On Mon Nov 21 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Nov 21 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
here's a revised patch.
...
+.Sh CAVEATS
+If the
+.Fn lseek
+system call is operating on a device,
Hi!
I need to draw graph of dummynet's CPU usage.
procstat -t 0 shows me TID (thread id) of dummynet kernel thread.
ps -Hxo time,lwp shows me total CPU time consumed by this thread.
Now I see this time has 9 seconds increase during 60 seconds of real time.
This should be 9/60=15% CPU usage, but
On Friday, November 18, 2011 11:48:20 am Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Hi,
Is there nice way in FreeBSD to force reprobe of devices for specific
driver like it is done when kernel module is loaded (via
DRIVER_MODULE(...) stuff)?
Note that those probes happen for specific buses rather than for
21.11.2011 23:37, Ryan Stone пишет:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Eugene Grosbein eu...@grosbein.pp.ru wrote:
Hi!
I need to draw graph of dummynet's CPU usage.
procstat -t 0 shows me TID (thread id) of dummynet kernel thread.
ps -Hxo time,lwp shows me total CPU time consumed by this
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Eugene Grosbein eu...@grosbein.pp.ru wrote:
Hi!
I need to draw graph of dummynet's CPU usage.
procstat -t 0 shows me TID (thread id) of dummynet kernel thread.
ps -Hxo time,lwp shows me total CPU time consumed by this thread.
Now I see this time has 9
On Nov 21, 2011, at 9:26 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 11:48:20 am Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Hi,
Is there nice way in FreeBSD to force reprobe of devices for specific
driver like it is done when kernel module is loaded (via
DRIVER_MODULE(...) stuff)?
Note that those
I have a process that tends to eat up all available disk bandwidth. I have
other processes that I would like to have preference over this one process. Is
there a facility that would allow me to assign priorities based on jail ID or
uid?
This is on 8-stable (but will upgrade to 9 soon) on
On 11/21/11, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, November 18, 2011 11:48:20 am Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Hi,
Is there nice way in FreeBSD to force reprobe of devices for specific
driver like it is done when kernel module is loaded (via
DRIVER_MODULE(...) stuff)?
Note that those
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
I have a process that tends to eat up all available disk bandwidth. I
have other processes that I would like to have preference over this one
process. Is there a facility that would allow me to assign priorities
based on
Am 21.11.2011 um 19:32 schrieb Adam Vande More:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
I have a process that tends to eat up all available disk bandwidth. I have
other processes that I would like to have preference over this one process.
Is there a facility
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Interesting, but it doesn't seem to offer limiting the I/O bandwidth
induced by a process or jail, or assigning different priorities, which
would need to be implemented in the ZFS or GEOM schedulers, I suppose.
Limiting
Am 21.11.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Adam Vande More:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Interesting, but it doesn't seem to offer limiting the I/O bandwidth induced
by a process or jail, or assigning different priorities, which would need to
be implemented in
Am 21.11.2011 um 21:42 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
Am 21.11.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Adam Vande More:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Interesting, but it doesn't seem to offer limiting the I/O bandwidth induced
by a process or jail, or assigning different
Can any hacker help me?
From: aram_baghom...@hotmail.com
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: How to compile opencrypto separately
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 06:24:17 +
Hi
I have some problems with opencrypto project and i hope you want to help me
for solve them.
- I trying to
2011/11/21 aram baghomian aram_baghom...@hotmail.com:
Hi
I'm sorry, i forgot to register my email address to your mailing list. now i
registered in it and resend
my question.
I have some problems with opencrypto project and i hope you want to help me
for solve them.
- I want to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote:
Unfortunately, the process I want to limit is not sufficiently CPU bound
to be limited that way vs. all the other processes. I guess I'll put in a
second disk.
Well, a couple other suggestions.
Have you tried with
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Nov 21 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Nov 21 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
here's a revised patch.
...
+.Sh CAVEATS
+If the
+.Fn lseek
+system call
21.11.2011 15:30, Luigi Rizzo пишет:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:23:22PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
I need to draw graph of dummynet's CPU usage.
procstat -t 0 shows me TID (thread id) of dummynet kernel thread.
ps -Hxo time,lwp shows me total CPU time consumed by this thread.
Now I
20 matches
Mail list logo
