.. where are these statistics coming from? top?
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:23:35PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Damien Fleuriot"
>
> >> I could understand a bit of overflow as stats are snapshots which may not
> >> be instuntanious, but 31GB instead of under 8GB is hardly a rounding
> >> issue /
> >>
Hello,
I wonder people would know if there is diffserv SNMP agent
implementation for FreeBSD that is available?
Googled a bit, but was not too successful in finding.
Thanks in advance!
Alan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:44:58AM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Hellenthal"
>
> > This goes along with the thoughts I had about 4 months ago tending to some
> > zfs statistics as well top showing greater than 100% actual CPU usage. This
> > is a bi
- Original Message -
From: "RW"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Invalid memory stats from vmstat and sysctl vm.vmtotal?
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:39:10 -
Steven Hartland wrote:
We're seeing some impossible memory usage stats reported on machines
here f
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:48:15 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:52:46AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, November 25, 2011 2:36:30 am Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > >
> > > Found a troubling result of the following and figured someone might want
> > > to
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:39:10 -
Steven Hartland wrote:
> We're seeing some impossible memory usage stats reported on machines
> here from vmstat and sysctl vm.vmtotal.
>
> We have machines reporting to be using 31GB total when they only have
> 8GB physical and are not using any swap.
>
> Here
- Original Message -
From: "Damien Fleuriot"
I could understand a bit of overflow as stats are snapshots which may not
be instuntanious, but 31GB instead of under 8GB is hardly a rounding
issue /
overflow.
With respect to top showing greater than 100% by how much are you talking?
Do y
On 12/1/11 11:44 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Jason Hellenthal"
>
>> This goes along with the thoughts I had about 4 months ago tending to
>> some
>> zfs statistics as well top showing greater than 100% actual CPU usage.
>> This
>> is a big pet peave of mine.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Hellenthal"
This goes along with the thoughts I had about 4 months ago tending to some
zfs statistics as well top showing greater than 100% actual CPU usage. This
is a big pet peave of mine. Its like saying you ate 134% of a bannanna when
in all realli
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Hi, hackers:
>
> Red Hat's "star" developer, Lennart Poettering, is porting Windows
> Event Log to GNU/Linux :)
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1IC9yOXj7j6cdLLxWEBAGRL6wl97tFxgjLUEHIX3MSTs&pli=1
>
> Regardless of his stupid arguments,
Hi, hackers:
Red Hat's "star" developer, Lennart Poettering, is porting Windows
Event Log to GNU/Linux :)
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1IC9yOXj7j6cdLLxWEBAGRL6wl97tFxgjLUEHIX3MSTs&pli=1
Regardless of his stupid arguments, let's talk about something
trivial. How about to implement RFC 5
12 matches
Mail list logo
