On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> I think what you found out is very sensitive.
> However, the patch is not correct as you cannot call
> cpuset_setthread() with thread_lock held.
Whoops! I actually discovered that for myself and had already fixed
it, but apparently I include
2012/1/28 Ryan Stone :
> Right now, whenever a thread is spawned, it inherits CPU affinity from
> its "parent" thread. I put parent in scare quotes because as far as I
> can tell, for a kernel thread the parent is essentially chosen
> arbitrarily (it looks like it is the most recent thread spawned
Right now, whenever a thread is spawned, it inherits CPU affinity from
its "parent" thread. I put parent in scare quotes because as far as I
can tell, for a kernel thread the parent is essentially chosen
arbitrarily (it looks like it is the most recent thread spawned in
that kernel process). Inhe
On 27 Jan 2012, at 03:26, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:52:44PM +, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> I suspect poor old RE is putting too much work into BETAs and RCs for
>> point releases.
>
> The counter-argument is that we have a lot more leeway to make mistakes
> on a .0 releas
FreeBSD Quarterly Status Report October-December, 2011
Introduction
This report covers FreeBSD-related projects between October and
December 2011. It is the last of the four reports planned for 2011.
This quarter was mainly devoted to polishing the bits for the next
major version of F
5 matches
Mail list logo
